Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41258053›Full record

ArticlePediatric research2026

Definitions and monitoring methods for apnea in preterm infants: a scoping review.

Emily Jeanne, Shasha Lv, Eva Sénéchal, Tugba Alarcon Martinez, Lydia Tao, Guilherme Sant'Anna, Debra E Weese-Mayer, Wissam Shalish

Erratum issuedAbstract readScoping Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Pediatric research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Emily JeanneDepartment of Medicine, Division of Clinical and Translational Research, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada.
Shasha LvMcGill University Health Center - Research Institute, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada.
Eva SénéchalDepartment of Medicine, Division of Clinical and Translational Research, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada.
Tugba Alarcon MartinezDepartment of Pediatrics, Division of Neonatology, Montreal Children's Hospital, McGill University Health Center, Montreal, QC, Canada.
Lydia TaoMcGill University Health Center - Research Institute, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada.
Guilherme Sant'AnnaDepartment of Pediatrics, Division of Neonatology, Montreal Children's Hospital, McGill University Health Center, Montreal, QC, Canada.
Debra E Weese-MayerCenter for Autonomic Medicine in Pediatrics, Department of Pediatrics, Ann & Robert H Lurie Children's Hospital of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA.
Wissam ShalishDepartment of Pediatrics, Division of Neonatology, Montreal Children's Hospital, McGill University Health Center, Montreal, QC, Canada. wissam.shalish@mcgill.ca.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDespite the ubiquity of apnea among preterm infants, optimal definitions and monitoring practices remain unknown. This scoping review aims to describe the clinical methods used to monitor apnea in preterm infants and apnea definitions employed across the neonatal literature.

methodsA search was performed in Cochrane Library, EMBASE, MEDLINE, and Web of Science for studies published in the last 25 years employing monitoring devices or algorithms for the purpose of identifying apneas in premature infants. Data surrounding participant information, devices employed, and apnea definitions were extracted.

resultsAcross 176 included studies, 12 different devices were used to monitor breathing efforts and 7 devices to monitor respiratory airflow with the aim of capturing apneas. Methods for monitoring airflow remain limited in sensitivity and feasibility. Of 164 apnea definitions extracted from the studies, 110 (67%) consisted only of a minimum duration of the respiratory pause, while 54 (33%) additionally cited the presence of bradycardia and/or oxygen desaturation.

conclusionSignificant variability exists in the methods used to detect apneas and the definitions employed in the current literature. Enhanced tools for monitoring apneas and standardized guidelines for defining apneas in preterm infants are needed. IMPACT: This scoping review offers a comprehensive overview of the methods used to detect apneas in preterm infants, as well as the definitions of apnea employed in neonatal research. The marked variability in apnea monitoring practices and definitions underscores the pressing need for standardization across clinical and research settings. Advancing standardized approaches may require targeted research efforts leveraging multimodal and longitudinal monitoring to better capture the complexity of apnea in preterm infants.

Indexed as

ApneaInfant, PrematureHumansInfant, NewbornMonitoring, PhysiologicRespiration

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.