ArticlePediatric research2026
Definitions and monitoring methods for apnea in preterm infants: a scoping review.
Article in Pediatric research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Risk of apnoea-related cardiorespiratory instability in preterm infants is modulated by clinical, demographic and dynamic indicators.Pediatric research · 2026Article
- Personalization of Caffeine Therapy for Apnea of Prematurity: A Potential Role for Sensor Technologies?Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundDespite the ubiquity of apnea among preterm infants, optimal definitions and monitoring practices remain unknown. This scoping review aims to describe the clinical methods used to monitor apnea in preterm infants and apnea definitions employed across the neonatal literature.
methodsA search was performed in Cochrane Library, EMBASE, MEDLINE, and Web of Science for studies published in the last 25 years employing monitoring devices or algorithms for the purpose of identifying apneas in premature infants. Data surrounding participant information, devices employed, and apnea definitions were extracted.
resultsAcross 176 included studies, 12 different devices were used to monitor breathing efforts and 7 devices to monitor respiratory airflow with the aim of capturing apneas. Methods for monitoring airflow remain limited in sensitivity and feasibility. Of 164 apnea definitions extracted from the studies, 110 (67%) consisted only of a minimum duration of the respiratory pause, while 54 (33%) additionally cited the presence of bradycardia and/or oxygen desaturation.
conclusionSignificant variability exists in the methods used to detect apneas and the definitions employed in the current literature. Enhanced tools for monitoring apneas and standardized guidelines for defining apneas in preterm infants are needed. IMPACT: This scoping review offers a comprehensive overview of the methods used to detect apneas in preterm infants, as well as the definitions of apnea employed in neonatal research. The marked variability in apnea monitoring practices and definitions underscores the pressing need for standardization across clinical and research settings. Advancing standardized approaches may require targeted research efforts leveraging multimodal and longitudinal monitoring to better capture the complexity of apnea in preterm infants.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41258053What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.