Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41258052›Full record

ArticlePatient safety in surgery2025

Impact of surgeon experience on patient outcomes after pelvic and acetabular fracture surgery.

Mark Ayoub, Yeng Vue, Emilio Robles, Jetha Tallapaneni, Armen Martirosian

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Patient safety in surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Letter to the editor on: "Operative time in acetabular fracture fixation: predictors and impact on postoperative outcomes".European journal of orthopaedic surgery & traumatology : orthopedie traumatologie · 2026
    Article
  2. Operative time in acetabular fracture fixation: predictors and impact on postoperative outcomes.European journal of orthopaedic surgery & traumatology : orthopedie traumatologie · 2026
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Mark AyoubDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, Fresno, USA. ayoubmarks@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0003-7209-6144
Yeng VueDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, Fresno, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2774-3202
Emilio RoblesDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, Fresno, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9963-6778
Jetha TallapaneniDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, Fresno, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2775-2037
Armen MartirosianDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, Fresno, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0004-8785-3619

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundEmerging data suggests present day surgeons coming out of training are treating fewer pelvic and acetabular injuries in practice than their predecessors. Few studies have investigated the acute effects of this in the perioperative setting, despite the critical condition of many of these patients. Accordingly, there is a need now for studies that examine how surgeon experience affects short-term outcomes in this patient population.

methodsThis is a retrospective cohort performed at a level I trauma center at UCSF- Fresno. Patients who underwent operative fixation for pelvic and/or acetabular fractures treated by a single fellowship-trained orthopaedic trauma surgeon year 1 through year 7 in practice were included. Electronic medical records were retrospectively reviewed for data collection. Yearly time points for surgeon experience were defined and compared. The primary outcome was acute surgical complications within six weeks. Secondary outcome measurements were estimated blood loss (EBL), operative time, transfusion requirements, and unplanned re-operation.

resultsTwo hundred and six patients met study criteria. There was a significant difference in complications during year 1 versus after year 1: 16.7% and 4.5%, respectively (p = 0.026), and between years 1–2 and after year 2, 13.3% and 3.4%, respectively, (p = 0.022). There was no difference in complications after 2 years. Average operative time in the first year was 271.5 minutes, whereas average operative time for years 2-7 was 185.1 minutes (p=0.016). This difference remained significant until after year 4. There was a significant difference in estimated blood loss (EBL) between post-training years 0-2 and years 2+: 505.5 mL and 263.6 mL, respectively (p = 0.039). There was a significance difference in EBL between years 0-3 versus years 3+. There was no statistically significant difference after this. There was no difference in transfusions received or unplanned re-operations at all time points.

conclusionsThere was no difference in complications at most time points. Despite statistically significant decreases in operative times and blood loss over the first five years in practice, pelvis and acetabular surgeries were shown to have significant blood loss and surgical time regardless of experience. Furthermore, there were no differences in transfusions and unplanned re-operations at all time points, suggesting that fellowship-trained surgeons in high-volume centers can safely treat these complex procedures without a clinically significant increase in morbidity early in their careers.

Indexed as

Acetabular surgeryAcetabulum outcomesPelvisSurgeon experience

Identifiers

PMID41258052
PMCPMC12628896

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.