ArticleJournal of occupational medicine and toxicology (London, England)2025
Exploring the impact of high reliability organization implementation on patient handling injury rates: a cross-sectional study.
Article in Journal of occupational medicine and toxicology (London, England), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundPatient handling injuries (PHIs) are among the leading causes of workplace injuries among healthcare workers. High-reliability organization (HRO) programs aim to prevent detrimental errors and improve organizational safety. This study examined the relationship between HRO implementation and direct care staffs' PHI rates.
methodsThis cross-sectional study used data from 124 Veterans Health Administration (VHA) facilities. HRO implementation was measured by program duration and HRO climate. Negative binomial regression models were used to examine the relationship between HRO implementation and PHI rates, progressively adjusting for staff-to-patient ratio, facility type, size, and complexity.
resultsA longer HRO program duration was associated with higher HRO climate (p = .01), but HRO implementation (duration and climate) was not associated with PHI rates. Higher staff-to-patient ratio was associated with lower PHI rates (p < .05). Ambulatory care service facilities had lower PHI rates than acute care facilities (β = -0.824, p = .03). The most clinically complex facilities (level 1a) had higher PHI rates than the level 3 least complex facilities (β = 0.806, p = .04).
conclusionWhile this study did not observe a significant relationship between HRO implementation and PHI rate among direct care staff, the study findings highlight the importance of adequate staffing for injury prevention and the need to consider facility type and complexity in PHI prevention efforts. Future research is needed to explore the impact of HRO on worker safety, using more sophisticated measures to assess HRO programs and climate.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.