ArticleInternational journal of retina and vitreous2025
Intravitreal faricimab in patients with aflibercept-refractory neovascular age-related macular degeneration: short and long-term outcomes and assessment of volume dynamics using an artificial intelligence-based tool.
Article in International journal of retina and vitreous, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeThis study assessed the short- and long-term outcomes of intravitreal (IVT) faricimab treatment in patients with neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD) refractory to aflibercept. The main aim was to investigate whether faricimab might enable longer treatment intervals versus aflibercept through improved fluid control, evaluated through use of an artificial intelligence-based quantification tool to evaluate retinal fluid dynamics.
methodsThis observational cohort study involved patients with refractory nAMD who received at least three consecutive IVT aflibercept 2.0 mg injections before switching to IVT faricimab (with a four-month loading phase followed by a treat-and-extend regimen) due to persistent or recurrent disease despite 4-8-week treatment intervals. Functional and anatomical outcome measures were recorded, and fluid volume dynamics were quantified, at baseline, monthly to Month 4, and at Months 6, 9, and 12.
resultsSeventy-four eyes from 60 patients were included, with a mean ± standard deviation duration of prior aflibercept therapy of 24 ± 17 months. Fifty-two eyes completed 12-month follow-up. At Month 12, mean best-corrected visual acuity showed no significant change from baseline (+ 0.01 Early Treatment of Diabetic Retinopathy Study letters, p = 0.64). Significant reductions in mean central retinal thickness (- 80.8 μm, p = 0.0001) and maximal pigment epithelium detachment (PED) height (- 28.2 μm, p = 0.011), were observed at Month 4 and maintained to Month 12. Mean fluid volumes (intraretinal fluid [IRF], subretinal fluid [SRF]), and PED decreased significantly at Month 4 (- 26.3 nL, p = 0.007; -41.5 nL, p = 0.0001; and - 175.4 nL, p = 0.0001, respectively). At Month 12, reductions in IRF and PED volumes were sustained. The maximal fluid-free interval increased from 4.4 weeks, prior to switching to faricimab, to 6.5 weeks (p = 0.001) after switching, while mean last treatment interval improved from 5.0 ± 1.4 weeks at baseline to 7.3 ± 2.6 weeks at month 12 (p < 0.0001).
conclusionFaricimab may offer a valuable alternative for patients with refractory nAMD. The use of four loading injections administered monthly, followed by a treat-and-extend regimen can result in maintenance of visual acuity and improve anatomical parameters and retinal fluid activity, allowing for longer treatment intervals.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.