ArticleNPJ science of learning2025
Personalized and gamified auditory-cognitive training improves naturalistic speech-in-noise comprehension in older adults with hearing loss.
Article in NPJ science of learning, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Tonal Auditory Discrimination Training in Youths: Design, Implementation, and Evaluation of Game-Based Versus Non-Game-Based Systems in a Cross-Sectional Study.JMIR serious games · 2026Article
- Identifying predictors of speech-in-noise perception in older adults with hearing impairment: the key role of working memory.BMC geriatrics · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This study examined whether a gamified and personalized auditory-cognitive training (ACT) program could improve naturalistic speech-in-noise (SIN) comprehension in older adults with mild-to-moderate hearing loss. In a randomized controlled trial, 54 older participants with hearing loss were assigned to four weeks of ACT or an active control condition. SIN comprehension was assessed using conversational sentences embedded in cafeteria noise. Complementary measures assessed working memory, selective attention, phonological short-term memory, divided attention, speech intelligibility, subjective hearing ratings, and subjective listening effort. Participants completing ACT demonstrated significant improvements in SIN comprehension, with partial cognitive gains, which remained at follow-up. Active controls showed no improvements. SIN intelligibility did not change in either group, indicating a dissociation between low-level fidelity and higher-order comprehension. No changes emerged in subjective hearing reports. These findings underline ACT's potential for supporting SIN comprehension in older adults with hearing loss, offering a promising complement to traditional auditory rehabilitation.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.