ArticleScientific reports2025
Uncovering age-specific subtypes of pediatric obesity and metabolic syndrome using machine learning algorithms.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Discriminative Ability of TyG, TyG-WC, BAI, FGIR, and QUICKI Indexes in Identifying Metabolic Syndrome in a Pediatric Population with Obesity.Metabolites · 2026Article
- Selected Nutraceuticals in Metabolic Syndrome: Molecular Mechanisms and Clinical Implications.Biomedicines · 2026Review
- Distinct metabolic phenotypes in adolescents with obesity identified by unsupervised learning: associations with insulin resistance and resting energy expenditure.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Identifying new subgroups among children and adolescents with obesity and metabolic syndrome requires advanced clustering techniques capable of analyzing complex multidimensional data. This study aimed to employ machine learning methods to enhance the classification of obesity and metabolic syndrome subgroups in youth, facilitating early detection and targeted intervention strategies. Data were derived from three nationwide, multicenter, school-based CASPIAN studies conducted in Iran during 2003-2004, 2009-2010, and 2015. After excluding metabolically healthy non-obese participants, the final sample included 382, 787, and 594 individuals aged 7-10, 11-14, and 15-18 years, respectively. Metabolic syndrome (MetS) status was defined according to Adult Treatment Panel III criteria. Unsupervised machine learning, specifically Gaussian Mixture Models (GMM), was applied to the top five principal components in each age group. The Davies-Bouldin index determined the optimal number of clusters. Clinical features associated with metabolism and obesity were analyzed within each cluster. In the 7-10 years group, six distinct clusters were identified based on key metabolic and anthropometric variables. The 11-14 years group yielded seven clusters, each with unique metabolic and anthropometric characteristics. For adolescents aged 15-18, six clusters reflected a more pronounced interaction between anthropometric measures and metabolic risk factors, consistent with physiological maturation. Stability tests showed mean clustering accuracies of 76.3%, 65.5%, and 52% for the three age groups, respectively. Predictability tests demonstrated an average accuracy exceeding 87% across all groups, indicating the robustness and reliability of the clustering approach. This study demonstrated that machine learning can uncover hidden metabolic and anthropometric heterogeneity in pediatric obesity, providing a methodological framework for identifying meaningful subgroups for targeted interventions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.