Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41258022›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Barriers and drivers to consuming neglected and underutilized species: evidence from six European countries.

Simoun Bayudan, Lukas Zagata, Lucie Plzakova, Hans De Steur, Joachim Jietse Schouteten

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Simoun BayudanDepartment of Agricultural Economics, Faculty of Bioscience Engineering, Ghent University, Ghent, 9000, Belgium. SimounRainierLuis.Bayudan@UGent.be.
Lukas ZagataDepartment of Humanities, Faculty of Economics and Management, Czech University of Life Sciences Prague, Prague, 16521, Czech Republic.
Lucie PlzakovaDepartment of Humanities, Faculty of Economics and Management, Czech University of Life Sciences Prague, Prague, 16521, Czech Republic.
Hans De SteurDepartment of Agricultural Economics, Faculty of Bioscience Engineering, Ghent University, Ghent, 9000, Belgium.
Joachim Jietse SchoutetenDepartment of Agricultural Economics, Faculty of Bioscience Engineering, Ghent University, Ghent, 9000, Belgium.

Funding

Horizon 2020 Framework Programme 101000847
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Neglected and underutilized species (NUS) are considered important for agrobiodiversity and landscape health, yet there is limited evidence on factors that encourage NUS consumption. Hence, this study examined drivers and barriers among consumers in including NUS products in their diets, following the premises of innovation resistance and food choice. An online consumer survey was conducted in six European countries to measure consumers' perceived barriers, drivers, and willingness to consume NUS. A total of 4802 responses from participants (balanced in age and gender) were analyzed (Mean age: 43.2 ± 13.0 years, 50.6% female, 49.4% male). Furthermore, hierarchical multiple linear regression showed that respondents had a neutral outlook towards consuming NUS. Psychological barriers seemingly had similar negative influences on intentions to consume NUS together with functional barriers. Motives to eat food alongside concerns for the environment and health and taste properties of food positively influenced NUS consumption intentions. Put together, understanding the balance of both driving and hindering factors for NUS consumption can therefore promote NUS consumption across broader audiences.

Indexed as

Consumer BehaviorDietFood PreferencesAdultEuropeFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedSurveys and QuestionnairesYoung AdultAncient cropsBarriers and driversConsumer behaviorDiversityMotivationMulticultural

Identifiers

PMID41258022
PMCPMC12630740

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.