ArticleScientific reports2025
Barriers and drivers to consuming neglected and underutilized species: evidence from six European countries.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Neglected and underutilized species (NUS) are considered important for agrobiodiversity and landscape health, yet there is limited evidence on factors that encourage NUS consumption. Hence, this study examined drivers and barriers among consumers in including NUS products in their diets, following the premises of innovation resistance and food choice. An online consumer survey was conducted in six European countries to measure consumers' perceived barriers, drivers, and willingness to consume NUS. A total of 4802 responses from participants (balanced in age and gender) were analyzed (Mean age: 43.2 ± 13.0 years, 50.6% female, 49.4% male). Furthermore, hierarchical multiple linear regression showed that respondents had a neutral outlook towards consuming NUS. Psychological barriers seemingly had similar negative influences on intentions to consume NUS together with functional barriers. Motives to eat food alongside concerns for the environment and health and taste properties of food positively influenced NUS consumption intentions. Put together, understanding the balance of both driving and hindering factors for NUS consumption can therefore promote NUS consumption across broader audiences.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.