Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41258020›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Multimodal fusion of ultrasound images using HXM net for breast cancer diagnosis.

G S Pradeep Ghantasala, Mura Akhil, Pellakuri Vidyullatha, Veeresalingam Guruguntla, Thota S S Bhaskara Rao, B A G Yuvaraju

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Convolutional-transformer fusion of ultrasound and diffuse optical tomography for breast lesion classification.Computerized medical imaging and graphics : the official journal of the Computerized Medical Imaging Society · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

G S Pradeep GhantasalaDepartment of Computer Science and Engineering, Alliance College of Engineering and Design, Alliance University, Bengaluru, India.
Mura AkhilData Science Department, Alliance University, Bengaluru, India.
Pellakuri VidyullathaDepartment of Computer Science and Engineering, Koneru Lakshmaiah Education Foundation, Vaddeswaram, Guntur, Andhra Pradesh, India.
Veeresalingam GuruguntlaDepartment of Mechanical Engineering Department, Madanapalle Institute of Technology & Science, Madanapalle, 517325, India.
Thota S S Bhaskara RaoDepartment of Mechanical Engineering Department, Madanapalle Institute of Technology & Science, Madanapalle, 517325, India.
B A G YuvarajuSchool of Mechanical Engineering, Vellore Institute of Technology Chennai, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, 600127, India. bag.yuvaraju@vit.ac.in.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Breast cancer is a major global health issue in women, where diagnosis at an early stage is decisive for enhancing the effectiveness of treatment and survival. Despite the advances in imaging using medical technologies, maintaining uniformly good diagnostic accuracy is challenging due to the difficulty of lesion characterization and limitations of single-modality imaging. This work presents HXM-Net, a deep learning model specifically tailored to improve breast cancer detection through the synergistic benefit of multi-modal ultrasound imaging. HXM-Net combines Convolutional Neural Networks (CNNs) for spatial feature extraction and Transformer-based fusion for optimal concatenation of information from the B-mode and Doppler ultrasound images. The dual modality-based method captures morphological and vascular features of breast lesions and produces a more informative and discriminative feature representation. The model embeds multi-scale feature learning and data augmentation to guarantee generalizability to different lesion types and patient populations. In the tests conducted on a class-balanced breast ultrasound database, the HXM-Net achieved accuracies of 94.20%, sensitivity (recall), 92.80%, specificity, 95.70%, an F1 score of 91.00%, and AUC-ROC of 0.97, thereby establishing the superiority of HXM-Net over conventional models like ResNet-50 and U-Net, especially in distinguishing benign tumours from malignant ones. The strong diagnostic ability and versatility of the model make it a good contender for integration with clinical decision support systems that can facilitate more assured diagnostics and enhanced patient care.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsMultimodal ImagingUltrasonography, MammaryDeep LearningFemaleHumansNeural Networks, ComputerUltrasonographyBreast cancer detectionDeep learningHXM-NetMulti-modal fusionResNet-50Transformer networksUltrasound imagingU-Net

Identifiers

PMID41258020
PMCPMC12630858

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.