Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41258012›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Evaluation of hazard perception skills among electric scooter riders in urban environments.

Anat Meir

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Anat MeirFaculty of Industrial Engineering and Technology Management, HIT - Holon Institute of Technology, P.O. Box 305, 5810201, Holon, Israel. anatm@hit.ac.il.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The rapid proliferation of electric scooters (e-scooters) has transformed urban mobility worldwide. Despite becoming a prominent mode of urban transport, their rising use has been accompanied by increased crash involvement. Hazard perception, the ability to detect, evaluate, and anticipate impending traffic events, is a critical determinant of road safety but remains underexplored among e-scooter riders. This study examined hazard perception in novice, intermediate, and experienced riders using a video-based hazard detection task requiring button responses and verbal descriptions. Generalised linear mixed models analyses revealed that experienced riders were more sensitive to unmaterialised hazards than novices and intermediates, while no group differences emerged for materialised hazards. Novice riders also provided fewer verbal descriptions of unmaterialised hazards than both the intermediate and experienced riders, though no differences were observed for materialised hazard descriptions. Pathway type further modulated performance: materialised hazards were most likely identified on roads, whereas unmaterialised hazards detection varied by pathway, highest on pavements, moderate on roads, and lowest in cycle lanes, indicating strong contextual effects. These findings demonstrate that hazard perception develops with riding experience and is influenced by infrastructure, offering foundational evidence to inform targeted training interventions, infrastructure design adaptations, and regulatory measures to enhance e-scooter safety.

Indexed as

Accidents, TrafficAutomobile DrivingPerceptionAdultCitiesFemaleHumansMaleSafetyYoung AdultE-scootersExperienceHazard perceptionMicro-mobilityTraffic safetyUrban mobility

Identifiers

PMID41258012
PMCPMC12630589

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.