ArticleScientific reports2025
Evaluation of hazard perception skills among electric scooter riders in urban environments.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The rapid proliferation of electric scooters (e-scooters) has transformed urban mobility worldwide. Despite becoming a prominent mode of urban transport, their rising use has been accompanied by increased crash involvement. Hazard perception, the ability to detect, evaluate, and anticipate impending traffic events, is a critical determinant of road safety but remains underexplored among e-scooter riders. This study examined hazard perception in novice, intermediate, and experienced riders using a video-based hazard detection task requiring button responses and verbal descriptions. Generalised linear mixed models analyses revealed that experienced riders were more sensitive to unmaterialised hazards than novices and intermediates, while no group differences emerged for materialised hazards. Novice riders also provided fewer verbal descriptions of unmaterialised hazards than both the intermediate and experienced riders, though no differences were observed for materialised hazard descriptions. Pathway type further modulated performance: materialised hazards were most likely identified on roads, whereas unmaterialised hazards detection varied by pathway, highest on pavements, moderate on roads, and lowest in cycle lanes, indicating strong contextual effects. These findings demonstrate that hazard perception develops with riding experience and is influenced by infrastructure, offering foundational evidence to inform targeted training interventions, infrastructure design adaptations, and regulatory measures to enhance e-scooter safety.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.