ArticleScientific reports2025
Dynamic forecasting of China's carbon market prices by the coupling of macroeconomic indicators and LSTM model.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Accurately forecasting carbon prices in China's carbon market remains a critical challenge for both low-carbon development and market regulation. This study proposes a hybrid Long Short-Term Memory-Convolutional Neural Network (LSTM-CNN) model that combines the strengths of CNN and LSTM networks. The coupling between the two networks was optimized using a dynamic weight allocation mechanism, while incorporating macroeconomic indicators such as GDP growth rate, Producer Price Index for Industrial Products, coal futures prices, interbank offered rates, and installed renewable energy capacity. Multi-source data were processed using Z-score standardization, min-max scaling, and related techniques. A three-dimensional input structure was constructed via a sliding window approach, and the model's long-term performance was evaluated through 12-month rolling validation. Comparative experiments were conducted against six alternative models: Generative Adversarial Networks, Recurrent Neural Networks, Deep Neural Networks, Autoencoders, Variational Autoencoders, and Gated Recurrent Units. The research scope encompassed hybrid model architecture design, macroeconomic variable selection and preprocessing, model parameter optimization, and multidimensional performance evaluation. Experimental results show that the proposed LSTM-CNN achieved a 33-68% improvement in prediction accuracy over a standalone LSTM and a 20-52% improvement over a standalone CNN. Its response time was 40% shorter than that of architectures with attention mechanisms, and it achieved a mean absolute error of 0.33. In predicting single-day price increases exceeding 5%, accuracy improved by 12.3% compared with a bidirectional LSTM. By adopting a progressive architecture in which the CNN filters local noise and the LSTM models temporal dependencies, the proposed model effectively captures both short-term high-frequency fluctuations and long-term trend dependencies in carbon prices. The model demonstrates strong noise resistance and generalization capabilities in high-noise time series data. The primary contribution of this study lies in the development of an optimized LSTM-CNN hybrid model that, for the first time, systematically integrates macroeconomic indicators into a carbon price forecasting framework. This model provides market participants with a more accurate decision-making tool and offers a methodological reference for multi-model coupling and multi-source data fusion in complex time series forecasting, thereby supporting low-carbon transition policies and the stable development of the carbon market.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.