ArticleScientific reports2025
Automated hypoxia and apnea identification for neonates via enhanced respiratory signal modeling with deep learning.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Artificial intelligence and digital technologies transforming neonatal respiratory assessment: a scoping review.Journal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association · 2026Review
- Video-based artificial intelligence for automated neonatal respiratory monitoring.European journal of pediatrics · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Neonatal respiratory monitoring is crucial for assessing breathing patterns, but the lack of real-time clinical data limits the development of machine learning (ML) models. This study provides a synthetic signal generation framework to replicate infant respiratory cycles with physiological fidelity. The dataset simulates normal and pathological breathing patterns such as apnea, hypoxia, and periodic breathing, including Gaussian noise and exponential functions, to maintain biological realism. A feature extraction pipeline was created to examine time- and frequency-domain characteristics, enabling the categorization of respiratory states using Convolutional Neural Networks (CNNs), CNN - BiLSTM and Random Forests. The CNN-BiLSTM model achieved the highest classification accuracy of 96.16%, outperforming the standalone CNN and RF models. The results illustrate the possibility of synthetic neonatal data for ML-based respiratory distress assessment. This architecture can be further extended for hardware implementation using e-textile-based respiratory monitoring. Real neonatal dataset integration and clinical validation of ML-DL models will be the main goals of future research to improve their robustness and applicability.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.