Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41257983›Full record

ArticleInjury epidemiology2025

The MAGA movement and political violence in 2024: findings from a nationally representative survey.

Garen J Wintemute, Bradley Velasquez, Sonia L Robinson, Elizabeth A Tomsich, Mona A Wright, Aaron B Shev

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Injury epidemiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Garen J WintemuteDepartment of Emergency Medicine, School of Medicine, UC Davis, Sacramento, CA, USA. gjwintemute@ucdavis.edu.
Bradley VelasquezDepartment of Emergency Medicine, School of Medicine, UC Davis, Sacramento, CA, USA.
Sonia L RobinsonDepartment of Emergency Medicine, School of Medicine, UC Davis, Sacramento, CA, USA.
Elizabeth A TomsichDepartment of Emergency Medicine, School of Medicine, UC Davis, Sacramento, CA, USA.
Mona A WrightDepartment of Emergency Medicine, School of Medicine, UC Davis, Sacramento, CA, USA.
Aaron B ShevDepartment of Emergency Medicine, School of Medicine, UC Davis, Sacramento, CA, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundToo little is known about the distribution of risk for committing political violence, a serious concern for the United States. This study explores the association between affiliation with the "Make America Great Again" (MAGA) movement and support for and willingness to engage in political violence.

methodsFindings are from Wave 3 of a nationally representative annual longitudinal survey of members of the Ipsos KnowledgePanel, conducted May 23-June 14, 2024. All KnowledgePanel members who responded to prior waves were invited to participate. Political party and MAGA affiliations were reported by respondents; the principal comparison is between MAGA Republicans and non-MAGA non-Republicans. Outcomes are expressed as weighted proportions and adjusted prevalence differences (aPDs, reported as percentage point (pp) differences), with p-values adjusted for the false discovery rate.

resultsThe completion rate was 88.4%; there were 8896 respondents. MAGA Republicans were more likely than non-MAGA non-Republicans to endorse violence to effect sociopolitical change and to consider violence usually or always justified to advance at least 1 of 21 specific political objectives (MAGA Republicans, 55.9% (95% CI 52.3%, 59.4%); non-MAGA non-Republicans, 25.5% (95% CI 23.7%, 27.2%); aPD 30.1pp (95% CI 26.0pp, 34.2pp), q < 0.001). They were not more willing to commit political violence. Similarly, while MAGA Republicans more frequently predicted that they would be armed in a setting where they considered political violence justified, they were not more likely to shoot someone (very or extremely likely: MAGA Republicans, 2.1% (95% CI 0.8%, 3.4%); non-MAGA non-Republicans, 1.6% (95% CI 1.0%, 2.1%); aPD 1.5pp (95% CI -0.1pp, 3.0pp), q = 0.43). Prevalences for other Republicans generally fell between those for MAGA Republicans and non-MAGA non-Republicans. In secondary analyses, MAGA Republicans endorsed attributes associated with political violence-racism, hostile sexism, homonegativity, transphobia, xenophobia, and Islamophobia; support for the QAnon movement and Christian nationalism; conspiracism; trait aggression; and authoritarianism-more frequently than did non-MAGA non-Republicans.

conclusionsIn 2024, MAGA Republicans were more likely than others to endorse political violence and attributes associated with political violence. They were not more willing to commit political violence themselves; their endorsement may increase the risk that political violence will occur.

Indexed as

AntisemitismAuthoritarianismChristian nationalismConspiracismDemocracyDomestic violent extremismFirearmsFirearm violenceHomonegativityHomophobiaHostile sexismIntimate partner violenceIslamophobiaMAGA movementMAGA republicanPolitical ideologyPolitical partiesPolitical violenceQAnonRacismTrait aggressionTransphobiaViolence and societyXenophobia

Identifiers

PMID41257983
PMCPMC12628544

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.