ArticleItalian journal of pediatrics2025
Diagnosis, management, and prevention of bronchiolitis in primary care: a survey of Italian family paediatricians.
Article in Italian journal of pediatrics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundPrimary care paediatricians play a key role in the diagnosis, management, and prevention of bronchiolitis, but data on their clinical practices remain limited.
methodsAn online survey was conducted via email by the Lombardy section of the Italian Primary Care Paediatrics Society (SICuPP) between January 1 and April 30, 2025. Primary care paediatricians were invited to participate via email. Associations were assessed using the chi-square or Fisher’s exact test. Multivariable logistic regression identified factors associated with the prescription of antibiotics, corticosteroids, and bronchodilators—three drug categories commonly used in bronchiolitis despite not being recommended by current guidelines.
resultsThe response rate was 28.8%, yielding 306 valid responses. Most respondents (62.1%) had over 20 years of clinical experience. Diagnostic criteria varied: 42.8% used 12 months as the upper age limit, 42.2% used 24 months, and 5.6% applied no age limit. Diagnostic approaches differed, with 45.1% relying on wheezing/grunting and 36.9% on wet sounds. Pulse oximetry was always used by 39.5%, and 67.9% never used rapid viral tests. Bronchodilators and steroids were recommended by 37.6% and 32.3%, respectively. Antibiotics were prescribed in 30.1% of cases with poor general condition and 18.6% with fever. Nirsevimab prophylaxis was well accepted (96.4%), with high caregiver compliance (97.7%). Paediatricians diagnosing bronchiolitis up to 36 months were less likely to report never prescribing antibiotics (OR 0.13, 95% CI 0.02–0.51), whereas those relying on widespread sounds were more likely than those using grunting or wheezing (OR 2.42, 95% CI 1.23–4.83). Bronchodilator use was lower with diagnosis based on widespread sounds (OR 0.38, 95% CI 0.18–0.77). Steroid use was higher without an age limit (OR 3.09, 95% CI 1.09–9.25) and lower with widespread sounds (OR 0.31, 95% CI 0.13–0.66).
conclusionsThis first Italian survey on bronchiolitis management in primary care reveals substantial variability in diagnostic and treatment practices. Diagnostic inconsistency is associated with non-guideline-recommended prescribing. Standardized diagnostic criteria are needed. Nirsevimab prophylaxis was widely accepted, supporting its continued use to reduce the burden of bronchiolitis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.