ArticleJournal of anesthesia, analgesia and critical care2025
National insights on malignant hyperthermia: a SIAARTI survey on clinical practices, preparedness, and future directions.
Article in Journal of anesthesia, analgesia and critical care, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- It will happen once in a lifetime: learning from the SIAARTI survey on malignant hyperthermia clinical practices.Journal of anesthesia, analgesia and critical care · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundMalignant hyperthermia (MH) syndrome is a rare pharmacogenetic disorder that can be highly life-threatening if diagnosis and treatment are delayed. The purpose of this study is to assess the knowledge and current practices of Italian anesthesiogists in managing malignant hyperthermia episodes.
methodsWe conducted a national survey. Data were collected via an online questionnaire distributed by the Italian Society of Anaesthesia, Analgesia, Resuscitation and Intensive Care (SIAARTI). Responses were collected over 15 weeks between July 15 and October 15, 2024, using an online General Data Protection Regulation-compliant platform.
resultsA total of 395 anesthetists completed the survey. The majority are employed in public (35%) and university hospitals (26%), with an average of 20 years of professional experience. MH had been managed at least once by 31% of respondents, and 70% of them declared they always report adverse reactions. In over 90% of cases, preventive measures (removal of trigger drugs, ventilator wash-out, perioperative care) are identified, although only 49% reported having an internal protocol in place at their institution. In most centers (89%), non-anesthesiologists are responsible for the storage and supply of dantrolene and only 66% of respondents correctly identify sterile water as its appropriate solvent. DISCUSSION: Our results highlight the need for broader standardization of MH management. Despite limitation in sample size and difference in geographical and hospital setting, the survey reveals a discrepancy between clinical practice and recommended strategies. Although the need for preventive measures as a mean to avoid episodes of MH is widely recognized, there continues to be too much ambiguity on what the exact protocol should be in these situations, leaving room to develop an unequivocal approach that allows the optimal treatment for episodes of MH.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.