Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41257961›Full record

ArticleTropical medicine and health2025

Pooled prevalence and factors associated with insecticide-treated net use among pregnant women in malaria high-burden countries in sub-Saharan Africa: a multilevel mixed-effects analysis.

Edson Mwebesa, Benson Musinguzi, Ismail D Legason, Robert Opoke, Bosco B Agaba, Rornald Muhumuza Kananura, Ann Mwangi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Tropical medicine and health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Edson MwebesaDepartment of Mathematics, Faculty of Science, Muni University, Arua, Uganda. e.mwebesa@muni.ac.ug.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4421-5356
Benson MusinguziDepartment of Medical Laboratory Sciences, Faculty of Health Sciences, Muni University, Arua, Uganda. b.musinguzi@muni.ac.ug.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1211-4617
Ismail D LegasonDepartment of Public Health, Faculty of Health Sciences, Muni University, Arua, Uganda.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6118-542X
Robert OpokeDepartment of Biology, Faculty of Science, Muni University, Arua, Uganda.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8886-7685
Bosco B AgabaFaculty of Medicine, Mbarara University of Science and Technology, Mbarara, Uganda.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4601-5171
Rornald Muhumuza KananuraCenter of Excellence for Maternal and Newborn Health, Makerere University School of Public Health, Kampala, Uganda.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9915-1989
Ann MwangiSchool of Science and Aerospace Studies, Moi University, Eldoret, Kenya.

Funding

Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionMalaria remains a significant public health challenge among pregnant women in sub-Saharan Africa (SSA). Proper use of insecticide-treated nets (ITNs) is a key intervention for malaria; however, their utilisation remains low and suboptimal in high-burden countries. Investigation of correlates of use of ITNs among pregnant women in only high-burden malaria countries SSA are dearth. This study aimed to identify the pooled prevalence and factors associated with ITNs use among pregnant women in seven malaria high-burden countries in SSA.

methodsSecondary analysis of recent (2017-2021) Malaria Indicator Survey (MIS) data from seven malaria high-burden countries in SSA was utilised. Women aged 15-49 years, who were pregnant during the survey, were included in this study, resulting in a pooled sample size of 4950 women. Pooled prevalence of ITN use was obtained through the use of proportions, with a 95% confidence interval (CI). A multilevel mixed-effect logistic regression model was run to obtain factors associated with ITNs use among pregnant women at 5% level of significance. Data analysis was done in Stata v17.0 and R 4.5.0.

findingsThe pooled prevalence of ITNs use among these countries was 63.8 [95% CI 61.8, 65.9], low in Ghana (49.2%) and high in Niger (90.5%). Having a primary level of education [aOR = 1.36, 95% CI 1.21, 1.53] compared to those with no formal education, having given birth to one to two children [aOR = 1.24, 95% CI 1.06, 1.44] compared to those with no births yet were associated with higher odds of ITN use. 14% of the total variation in ITN use was attributable to differences between countries [intra-cluster correlation (ICC) = 0.14, 95% CI 0.06, 0.20] and 32% of the variation in ITN use within countries is attributed to differences between regions [ICC = 0.32, 95% CI 0.21, 0.46].

conclusionsThe prevalence of ITN use was suboptimal, and socio-demographic and household factors are associated with ITN use among pregnant women, with substantial in-country variation underscoring the role of regional context in ITN utilization. These findings suggest that beyond individual and household determinants, local and regional contexts play a critical role in shaping ITN usage patterns. Interventions should, therefore, be tailored not only to socio-demographic profiles but also to regional and local disparities in access, awareness, and implementation effectiveness.

Indexed as

Insecticide-treated netsMalariaPregnant womenSub-Saharan Africa

Identifiers

PMID41257961
PMCPMC12628586

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.