ArticleBMC health services research2025
Urban-rural disparities in spatiotemporal accessibility of pharmacy care: a case study of Vermont, USA.
Article in BMC health services research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Mobile signaling big data, healthcare-seeking flows, and multidimensional healthcare access in Shanghai: implications for healthcare supply-demand matching and medical security governance.Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
- How does on-demand delivery impact the accessibility and equity of community pharmacies? Perspective from groups with heterogeneous geographic-digital barriers.Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
- Urban-rural disparities in spatiotemporal accessibility of pharmacy care: a case study of Vermont, USA.BMC health services research · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundPharmacies are more accessible than other health care services, providing frontline primary and preventative health care. Recent research has underscored the importance of pharmacy access for reaching underserved and rural populations. However, minimal attention has been given to the spatial and temporal dimensions of access to pharmacy care despite evidence that geographic accessibility impacts the utilization of healthcare services.
methodsThis study measured spatiotemporal variation in access to pharmacy care across Vermont using the enhanced two-step floating catchment area (E2SFCA) method. We surveyed 102 (87%) Vermont pharmacy locations for data on hours of operation and staffing levels during Fall 2023, and we completed data for an additional 15 in-state and 75 out-of-state locations with public data and imputation. Population data was sourced from the Census and road data from OpenStreetMap. We computed hourly spatial accessibility scores by county subdivision for weekdays, Saturdays, and Sundays, and compared results for metropolitan, micropolitan, and rural areas, testing for significance using the Kruskal-Wallis H Test.
resultsOur findings reveal significant disparities in pharmacy access between rural and urban areas. Access also dropped significantly on Saturdays and Sundays compared to weekdays. We found proportionately greater reductions in access on weekends for rural areas than for urban areas. Virtually all Vermonters lack access to community pharmacies at night, while the daily cycles of access are similar across urban and rural areas.
conclusionsOur study revealed important urban-rural differences in the spatial accessibility of pharmacies across Vermont and highlighted how temporal accessibility compounds with spatial accessibility in rural areas. The results are useful for informing public health policy and the provision of health services. We have also demonstrated the importance of data on pharmacy operating hours and service levels for modeling spatiotemporal pharmacy accessibility, highlighting the need for further research and improving centralized databases to facilitate research in this field.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.