ArticleScientific reports2025
Carbon footprint analysis and carbon neutrality potential of desalination by reverse osmosis for different applications basd on life cycle assessment method.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Reverse osmosis (RO) technology, as a mainstream method of water treatment, is widely used worldwide for water resource acquisition. However, in the context of the current global effort to achieve carbon neutrality, its carbon footprint has gradually attracted attention. The aim of this study is to systematically assess the carbon footprint of the RO water treatment process during its full life cycle and to explore the carbon reduction potential of the RO water treatment process under different decarbonization scenarios. To analyze RO's carbon footprint in different applications, this study constructed a life cycle model of the RO water treatment process under the business model, calculating footprints for seawater reverse osmosis (SWRO), brackish water reverse osmosis (BWRO), and reclaimed water reuse. Results showed carbon footprints of 3.258, 2.868, and 3.083 kg CO₂-eq/m³ for the three applications, with operational power as the main carbon source, followed by chemical use, membrane production, and disposal. The carbon footprint of the three applications can be reduced by up to 93.23%, 87.81%, and 51.12% by predicting the grid structure, waste recycling and disposal methods, and energy consumption after process operation optimization. Sensitivity analyses of key process variables showed that the carbon footprint was more sensitive to influent temperature, system energy recovery, and influent salinity than membrane product life. Thus, the study recommends a comprehensive strategy involving renewable energy, energy efficiency improvements, and operational optimization to lower RO's carbon footprint and support carbon neutrality.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.