ArticleBMC health services research2025
Integrating an occupational therapist into a primary health care team: a mixed-method evaluation of a home-based service delivery.
Article in BMC health services research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Factors affecting belongingness of Occupational Therapists in an Interprofessional Clinical Environment.Pakistan journal of medical sciences · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundIncorporating occupational therapists (OTs) into primary care requires adapting services to patient needs and depends on how colleagues within the multidisciplinary team perceive the OT roles and collaborate in daily practice. This study explored the feasibility, impact on the care team, and challenges of incorporating an OT into the home-based care service of a Spanish primary healthcare center.
methodsA two-phase sequential exploratory mixed-methods study was conducted. First, structured interviews and a stakeholder focus group were conducted over the six months following the introduction of the OT. Thematic analysis identified factors that hindered or supported integration. Second, a cross-sectional study described patients who received OT care within 12 months of service implementation. The electronic health records provided patient profiles and OT interventions. Descriptive statistics and the Kruskal–Wallis tests were used to examine the associations between the study and patient characteristics.
resultsSix themes emerged: introduction of the OT role, team coordination, impact on team functioning, impact on patient and caregiver, contributions of the OT, and structural limitations and challenges. OT integration improved interdisciplinary collaboration and patient-centered care; however, initial role ambiguity and a lack of referral criteria were challenges. Over 12 months, 248 patients were visited (mean age, 88.2 years; 70.9% women), with an average of 11.1 chronic conditions. Overall, 45.6% had severe or total dependency in activities of daily living, and 43.2% reported at least one fall in the past year. OT interventions focused on risk assessment (65.6%) and home adaptation (52.5%). Patients with moderate-to-severe functional dependency received more risk assessment activities (median: 2; p = 0.005). No significant associations were found between intervention frequency and fall history or other functional domains.
conclusionsIntegrating an OT into a primary health care team appears feasible and valuable. Sustainable implementation may require clear patient profiles, defined professional roles, structured integration processes, robust evaluation frameworks, and service standardization-based workforce planning.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.