Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41257830›Full record

ArticleBMC urology2025

Efficacy and safety of super-mini percutaneous nephrolithotomy using a combination of suction sheath and pneumatic lithotripsy: the Dhangadhi experience.

Sumeet Karna

Abstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in BMC urology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Sumeet KarnaDepartment of Urology, Maya Metro Hospital, Chattakpur-03, Dhangadhi, Far-Western Province, Nepal. sumeetkarna@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7031-7861

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeSuper-mini percutaneous nephrolithotomy (SMP) is a promising minimally invasive approach for upper tract stone management. However, evidence on its performance using suction sheath and pneumatic lithotripsy in resource-limited setting remains scarce. The main objective of this study is to examine the efficacy and safety of SMP done exclusively with this combination.

methodsProspectively collected data of all eligible SMP cases done in two centers between March 2021 and February 2025 were retrospectively processed. After de-identification of the final data, descriptive and analytical statistics were used as appropriate. Regression models were then constructed to identify risk factors for complications.

resultsTotal of 324 prone SMP procedures were performed on 319 patients. The mean stone volume, operating time and fluoroscopy beam-on time were 1473 mm

conclusionSMP using a combination of suction sheath and pneumatic lithotripsy is a safe and effective treatment option for selected cases with upper tract lithiasis in resource-limited settings, with high stone clearance and acceptable complication rates.

Indexed as

Kidney CalculiLithotripsyNephrolithotomy, PercutaneousAdultAgedFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedRetrospective StudiesSuctionTreatment OutcomeKidney stoneNepalPercutaneous nephrolithotomySepsisSuction sheathSuper-mini PCNL

Identifiers

PMID41257830
PMCPMC12628933

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.