ArticleInternational journal of retina and vitreous2025
Evaluation of the degree of agreement in the diagnosis of diabetic retinopathy between ophthalmologists and EyeArt
Article in International journal of retina and vitreous, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Targeting vision-threatening disease in EyeArt-based diabetic retinopathy screeningInternational journal of retina and vitreous · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objective or purposeTo evaluate the diagnostic performance and agreement of the EyeArt
designCross-sectional observational study. SUBJECTS, PARTICIPANTS, AND/OR CONTROLS: A total of 498 diabetic patients aged 18 years or older were enrolled between June and September 2023 through the Retisalud DR screening program in the Canary Islands. No separate control group was included.
methodsAll participants underwent non-mydriatic fundus photography using the TRC-NW400 camera. Retinal images were analyzed by the EyeArt
main outcome measuresSensitivity, specificity, and agreement (Cohen's kappa) of the AI system compared to clinical diagnosis; predictors of DR such as age, diabetes duration, presence of Diabetic Macular Edema (DME), and central retinal thickness (CRT-OCT).
resultsThe EyeArt® system achieved a binocular sensitivity of 100% (95% CI: 98.1-100) and a specificity of 93.5% (95% CI: 90.2-96.0). Agreement with ophthalmologist grading was excellent, with kappa values of 0.966 (right eye) and 0.978 (left eye). Younger age, longer diabetes duration, DME presence, and higher CRT were significantly associated with DR diagnosis.
conclusionsThe EyeArt
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.