ArticleBMC oral health2025
Volumetric evaluation of the maxillary sinus using cone-beam computed tomography.
Article in BMC oral health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Morphometric Analysis of the Maxillary Sinus Using CT-Based Air-Cavity Reconstruction: A Retrospective Study.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- Assessment of Paranasal Sinus Growth with 3D Volumetric Measurements and the Effect of Anatomic Variations on Sinus Volume in a Pediatric Population.Tomography (Ann Arbor, Mich.) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundVolumetric evaluation of the maxillary sinus is a crucial step in preoperative planning for various dental and maxillofacial procedures. Multiple anatomical and demographic factors, such as age, sex, and nasal septum deviation, are known to influence sinus morphology. While previous studies have examined these factors individually, a comprehensive analysis integrating their collective impact on sinus volume is still needed. Cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) provides a valuable tool for accurate three-dimensional assessment, enabling clinicians to identify anatomical variations and plan for safer surgical interventions.
aimThis study aimed to comprehensively evaluate the volumetric changes of the maxillary sinus using CBCT and to determine the independent and collective influence of age, sex, nasal septum deviation, and tooth loss on sinus volume.
methodsA retrospective analysis was conducted on CBCT scans of 120 patients (mean age: 33.6 ± 16.8 years; 60 males, 60 females). The scans were standardized and evaluated by an experienced oral radiologist on a calibrated monitor. Maxillary sinus volumes were measured using 3D Slicer software, with specific attention to the field of view (FOV) and voxel size of the scans. Associations between sinus volume and demographic or anatomical factors were assessed using correlation and regression analyses.
resultsThe mean sinus volumes were 14.26 cm³ (SD: 5.66) on the right and 14.44 cm³ (SD: 5.40) on the left side (p = 0.414). Age was negatively correlated with sinus volume (r = - 0.31, p < 0.01), and males had significantly greater volumes than females (p < 0.05). Nasal septal deviation was a significant independent predictor in regression analysis (β = +1257.0, p = 0.030). The final model explained 17.9% of the variance (adjusted R² = 0.150).
conclusionMaxillary sinus volume is significantly influenced by age, sex, and nasal septal deviation, with males exhibiting larger volumes and age showing a negative correlation. These findings underscore the importance of accurate CBCT-based volumetric assessment for personalized surgical planning, particularly in cases involving nasal septum deviation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.