Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41257776›Full record

ArticleBMC medical genomics2025

Improving newborn screening accuracy through genome sequencing, targeted metabolomics, and machine learning.

Yuhan Xie, Gang Peng, Irina Tikhonova, Gregory Enns, Hongyu Zhao, Tina Cowan, Curt Scharfe

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC medical genomics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Yuhan XieDepartment of Genetics, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA.
Gang PengDepartment of Medical and Molecular Genetics, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, USA.
Irina TikhonovaDepartment of Genetics, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA.
Gregory EnnsDepartment of Pediatrics, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA.
Hongyu ZhaoDepartment of Genetics, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA.
Tina CowanDepartment of Pathology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA.
Curt ScharfeDepartment of Genetics, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA. curt.scharfe@yale.edu.

Funding

National Institute of Child Health and Human Development R01HD102537
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundNewborn screening (NBS) enables early detection of metabolic disorders, but current tandem mass spectrometry (MS/MS) methods often lead to false positives and require confirmatory testing, causing diagnostic delays. We evaluated whether integrating genome sequencing, expanded metabolite profiling, and artificial intelligence/machine learning (AI/ML) could improve the accuracy of NBS.

methodsWe analyzed dried blood spots (DBS) from 119 screen-positive cases identified by the California NBS program across four disorders: GA-I, PA/MMA, OTCD, and VLCADD. Genome sequencing was performed to identify variants in condition-related genes using ACMG guidelines, and an AI/ML classifier trained on previously generated metabolomic data was applied to differentiate true and false positives.

resultsGenome sequencing confirmed 89% (31/35) of true positives based on the presence of two reportable variants. Among 84 false positives, 74% (62) had no variant, while 26% (22) carried a pathogenic/likely pathogenic variant or rare VUS in a condition-related gene. For VLCADD, half of false positives (15/29) were ACADVL variant carriers (P = 4.66 × 10⁻⁷). VLCADD biomarker levels were highest in patients, intermediate in carriers, and lowest in non-carriers, indicating that ACADVL variants elevate biomarker levels and increase false-positive rates. Metabolomics with AI/ML detected all true positives (100% sensitivity), while genome sequencing reduced false positives by 98.8%.

conclusionTargeted metabolomics with AI/ML showed high sensitivity for identifying true positives, though its ability to reduce false positives varied by condition. Genome sequencing effectively reduced false positives but lacked sufficient sensitivity as a standalone test. The elevated false-positive rate among pathogenic variant carriers underscores the potential value of parental or prenatal carrier screening to improve NBS accuracy. Integrating genomic and metabolomic data may enhance NBS precision and enable earlier diagnosis and intervention for rare diseases.

Indexed as

Machine LearningMetabolomicsNeonatal ScreeningWhole Genome SequencingHumansInfant, NewbornDried blood spotMachine learningMetabolic disorderMetabolomics profilingMolecular diagnosticsNewborn screeningNext-generation sequencingRare diseases

Identifiers

PMID41257776
PMCPMC12628566

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.