ArticleBMC pregnancy and childbirth2025
Desa SIAGA, a community participation model for maternal and neonatal health in Indonesia, barriers and facilitators to implementation: findings from a comparative case study design.
Article in BMC pregnancy and childbirth, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
background'Desa SIAGA' (alert village) is a community participation model (CPM) aiming to improve maternal and neonatal health (MNH) outcomes by empowering communities to prepare women for safe birth in Indonesia. However, there is limited evidence exploring the implementation of CPM within the Desa SIAGA programme. This study aimed to explore the implementation of Desa SIAGA in preparing women for birth and the potential to improve MNH in practice.
methodsA qualitative comparative case study with 23 in-depth interviews was conducted involving pregnant and post-natal women, village midwives, cadres and key stakeholders in two cases in Central Java, Indonesia in 2019. Interview data were analysed using thematic analysis approach. The interpretation was strengthened by non-participant observation of essential community meetings, fieldnotes, documentary analysis and cross-case synthesis. All relevant ethical approvals were obtained.
resultsFive key facilitators and barriers were found to influence the effective implementation and potential of the Desa SIAGA programme to improve MNH outcomes, these included: lack of empowerment in decision making, knowledge, and economic constraints; lack of clearly defined roles; workload; and social, cultural, and religious values.
conclusionsThe Desa SIAGA programme could bring benefits to improve MNH outcomes through the active participation of the community, but this will remail limited unless its delivery and implementation is underpinned by strong policy and supported by key actors. The findings of this study provide important evidence for policymakers in similar context in constructing policy towards the delivery and implementation of community participation programme.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.