Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41257733›Full record

SynthesisReproductive biology and endocrinology : RB&E2025

Global prevalence of adenomyosis and endometriosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Mei-Huan Wang, Jia-Hui Chen, Xin-Yu Qi, Zhi-Xun Li, Ying Huang

Abstract readSystematic ReviewMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Reproductive biology and endocrinology : RB&E, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne · 2026
    Article
  7. Renal atrophy, bowel obstruction, and sciatic nerve impingement secondary to deep endometriosis.CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne · 2026
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. ECDrug design, development and therapy · 2026
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Mei-Huan WangDepartment of Ultrasound, Shengjing Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, Liaoning, China.
Jia-Hui ChenDepartment of Ultrasound, Shengjing Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, Liaoning, China.
Xin-Yu QiDepartment of Ultrasound, Shengjing Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, Liaoning, China.
Zhi-Xun LiDepartment of Ultrasound, Shengjing Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, Liaoning, China.
Ying HuangDepartment of Ultrasound, Shengjing Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, Liaoning, China. huangying712@163.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThe objective of this meta-analysis is to provide a comprehensive and up-to-date assessment of the prevalence of endometriosis and adenomyosis, addressing the limitations of existing research data and evaluating the quality of the data.

methodsAdhering to the PRISMA 2020 guidelines, this study systematically searched the Web of Science, PubMed, Embase, and Google Scholar databases from their inception until January 2025 for studies related to adenomyosis and endometriosis. All studies that specifically reported the prevalence of adenomyosis and endometriosis, or provided data enabling calculation of their prevalence, were included. The research examined the occurrence of different subtypes of adenomyosis and endometriosis, as well as frequency in various populations. Furthermore, subgroup analyses were conducted to synthesize findings related to distinct diagnostic criteria, gynecological symptoms, and the prevalence of these two conditions across diverse populations. Meta-analyses were performed using meta software packages, and random-effects models with 95% confidence intervals (CI) were employed to determine the combined prevalence of adenomyosis.

resultsA total of 198,925,726 women from 127 studies (59 on adenomyosis and 68 on endometriosis) were included in this meta-analysis. The prevalence of focal and diffuse adenomyosis was found to be 17% (95%CI, 7%-30%) and 15% (95%CI, 9%-23%), respectively. The prevalence of peritoneal endometriosis, ovarian endometriosis, and deep endometriosis was recorded at 6% (95%CI, 1%-15%), 13% (95%CI, 5%-24%), and 10% (95%CI, 2%-24%), respectively. The prevalence of adenomyosis and endometriosis among women experiencing infertility was 31% (95%CI, 10%-58%) and 38% (95%CI, 25%-51%), respectively. Furthermore, among patients experiencing gynecologic symptoms, the pooled of adenomyosis and endometriosis was 41%-49%, and 18%-42%, respectively. The global prevalence of adenomyosis and endometriosis in the general population worldwide is 1% (95%CI, 0%-2%), and 5% (95%CI, 2%-9%), respectively.

conclusionsIn conclusion, endometriosis occurs more frequently than adenomyosis across various populations. Notably, it affects nearly 50% of individuals experiencing gynecological symptoms. This study provides valuables support for public health management and emphasizes the importance of prompt intervention and treatment for related conditions.

Indexed as

AdenomyosisEndometriosisFemaleGlobal HealthHumansPrevalenceAdenomyosisDysmenorrheaEndometriosisEpidemiologyHysterectomy

Identifiers

PMID41257733
PMCPMC12629041

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.