ArticleBMC musculoskeletal disorders2025
Sex differences in joint pain, limb function and quality of life among patients with Kashin-Beck disease in Northwest China.
Article in BMC musculoskeletal disorders, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundKashin-Beck disease (KBD) remains a significant public health challenge in northwestern China, where chronic joint pain and functional limitations severely compromise quality of life (QoL). Despite growing recognition of sex-related disparities in musculoskeletal conditions, sex-specific differences in pain, limb function, and QoL among KBD patients remain underexplored. This study aimed to investigate these disparities to enhance understanding and guide tailored management.
methodsA cross-sectional study was conducted among 329 patients with KBD (160 males and 169 females) in endemic areas of Shaanxi Province, Northwest China. Validated assessment tools were employed, including the Graded Chronic Pain Scale (GCPS), Quick Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand Questionnaire (QuickDASH), Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC), and three-level EuroQol five-dimensional questionnaire (EQ-5D-3 L), to evaluate pain, limb function, and QoL. Sex differences were analyzed using Chi-square tests, independent-sample t-tests, and Mann-Whitney U tests.
resultsFemale patients exhibited significantly poorer upper-limb function than males (QuickDASH: 55.4 ± 23.7 vs. 39.1 ± 24.1; p < 0.001), surpassing the minimal clinically important difference (MCID) threshold of 14.0. Pain distribution varied by sex: females reported more hand/foot pain, whereas males more commonly experienced knee/ankle pain (all p < 0.05). Although differences in pain intensity (6.9 ± 1.6 vs. 6.5 ± 1.6; p = 0.016) and lower-limb function (WOMAC: 50.6 ± 20.6 vs. 45.2 ± 18.1; p = 0.012) were statistically significant, they did not exceed the corresponding MCID thresholds (1.0 and 16.1, respectively). Moreover, females had significantly poorer QoL scores (EQ-5D-3 L: 0.589 ± 0.252 vs. 0.684 ± 0.233, p < 0.001; EQ-VAS: 45.7 ± 21.7 vs. 52.7 ± 19.1, p = 0.002).
conclusionsThis study revealed clinically significant sex differences in upper-limb function among KBD patients in Northwest China, with females experiencing greater impairment. While other observed sex differences in pain and lower-limb function were statistically significant, they lacked clinical meaningfulness. The distinct patterns of pain distribution and the significantly poorer QoL observed in females warrant clinical attention. These findings highlight the importance of prioritizing upper limb rehabilitation in treatment strategies, particularly for female patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.