ArticleHarm reduction journal2025
"You're not informed unless you make it your business": insights from a Scottish national study exploring attitudes towards residential rehabilitation.
Article in Harm reduction journal, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundDespite Scotland's commitment to patient-centred substance use care, little is known about how individuals learn of residential rehabilitation. This study explores whether national policy goals of informed decision-making translate into on-the-ground practice.
methodsThis paper presents a secondary analysis of data generated during a larger mixed-methods evaluation of residential rehabilitation. Participants (n = 197 people who reported a drug problem in the previous 12 months) were recruited from 29 Scottish Local Authority areas and completed structured face-to-face interviews. Peer researchers with lived experience conducted interviews. Qualitative data were thematically examined according to macro-level (systemic), meso-level (community), and micro-level (individual) influences.
resultsMany participants reported never being informed of residential rehabilitation by healthcare providers. In response, peers, family, and community support groups filled information gaps, though their accounts were inconsistent or contradictory. Consequently, individuals resorted to micro-level strategies, such as internet searches and repeated questioning of key workers, to piece together essential details. Participants frequently expressed frustration with missed opportunities to explore alternative treatment pathways, compounding a sense of systemic neglect and disempowerment. This dynamic interplay between macro, meso, and micro factors often hindered genuinely informed decision-making and undermined policy ambitions for accessible, rights-based care.
conclusionsFindings highlight pervasive communication gaps, echoing other contexts where new or less-familiar treatment options remain poorly signposted. Mandated communication protocols, formal peer collaboration, and reduced burdens on individuals could strengthen the alignment between practice and Scotland's National Mission. By closing these knowledge gaps, services can better support people with problem substance use to make truly informed decisions about residential rehabilitation and broader treatment pathways.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.