Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41257692›Full record

ArticleBMC medical education2025

A scoping review of somatization: characteristics and implications among health profession students.

Edie L Sperling, Jennifer M Hulett

Abstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in BMC medical education, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Edie L SperlingCollege of Osteopathic Medicine of the Pacific- Northwest, Western University of Health Sciences, 200 Mullins Dr., Lebanon, OR, 97385, USA. esperling@westernu.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6999-079X
Jennifer M HulettSinclair School of Nursing & Ellis Fischel Cancer Center, University of Missouri-Columbia, 915 Hitt St, Columbia, MO, 65211, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5833-7624

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSomatization has gained recognition for its potential impact on medical students' quality of life and career longevity, who function in a high-stress environment and frequently have poor mental health, but somatization is much less researched among other health profession students who strive to excel in the same environments. Both mental and physical health issues predict leaving a career in healthcare. The aims of this scoping review were to describe and characterize somatic symptoms related to mental health in medical, dental, veterinary, nursing, and physical therapy students; define the outcome measures of somatization which were used; and document the existing evidence for interventions to prevent or treat somatization in these populations.

methodsDeveloped in alignment with PRISMA-ScR guidelines, a comprehensive search was performed with 17 databases, bibliographic searching, and hand- searching, with eligible primary studies having medical, dental, veterinary, nursing, or physical therapy students, at least one measure of somatization or a statistical analysis of separate mental and physical health measures, written in or translated into English. Data charting was performed by a trained researcher and two authors reviewed each article.

resultsSeventy-three articles met inclusion criteria, inclusive of 51 medical, 14 nursing, seven dental, three veterinary, and zero physical therapy students; and two studies had heterogeneous populations. Studies represented data from 26,200 students from 29 countries. The prevalence of somatization ranged from 5.7% to 85.2% with a weighted average of 34.4%. Commonly reported somatic symptoms were insomnia, temporomandibular disorder, and musculoskeletal pain. Seventeen studies included an intervention aimed at improving somatization or associated mental and physical health outcomes. Twenty different direct somatization outcome measures were used, and we review them based on validity and reliability.

conclusionsSomatic symptoms were highly prevalent in all assessed health professions and primary articles reported them to be strongly correlated with mental distress. Further research is necessary, particularly in the U.S., which now claims just five primary articles in the past three decades. Research on non- medical health profession students is particularly lacking, as are controlled trials and research examining the effects of somatic symptoms of stress on long-term quality of life and career attrition from the healthcare field.

Indexed as

Somatoform DisordersStudents, Health OccupationsHumansMental HealthQuality of LifeStudents, MedicalDental studentsHealthcare studentsMedical studentsMental healthNursing studentsPhysical healthSomatizationVeterinary students

Identifiers

PMID41257692
PMCPMC12628534

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.