ArticleBMC psychiatry2025
Establishment of an electronic library in forensic psychiatric wards: a survey of its actual use by forensic inpatients.
Article in BMC psychiatry, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
18 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundSimilar to prison inmates, patients in forensic psychiatric wards may have restricted access to information. From a human rights perspective, improving information access is a desirable objective.
methodsA dedicated electronic library (e-library) was set up for use by forensic inpatients in Japanese forensic psychiatric wards. Forensic psychiatric inpatients who consented to participate in the study accessed the e-library with Information and Communication Technology devices. Demographic and psychotropic prescription information, e-library usage information, and the results of psychological tests were collected. Additionally, the relationship between behaviour associated with e-library use and the patients’ psychiatric symptoms were analysed.
resultsThe mean age of the 91 participants was 41.9. The total number of lending electronic books was 3429. The average and median number of logins were 48.3 and 20.0, respectively. The most common psychiatric diagnosis was schizophrenia spectrum disorders (89.0%). The ‘over 20 times login’ group had a significantly lower clozapine prescription rate and a higher full Intelligence Quotient score than the ‘less than 20 times login’ group. The group with higher logins also exhibited significantly higher scores in Bodily pain and Mental health scores on the Short Form-8 Health Survey.
conclusionsPhysical and mental health may be positively associated with e-library use. The results suggest a demand for e-libraries among forensic psychiatric inpatients and have implications for policies about supplying e-libraries for forensic psychiatric wards. CLINICAL TRIAL NUMBER: Not applicable.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.