Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41257657›Full record

ArticleBMC urology2025

Investigation on the current status of secondary transurethral resection for bladder cancer among Chinese urologists and construction of an acceptance prediction model.

Xianjun Liu, Shengkun Sun, Hengen Wang, Shujun Yang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC urology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Xianjun LiuDepartment of Urology, Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing, 100853, China.
Shengkun SunDepartment of Urology, Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing, 100853, China. sunshengkun@301hospital.org.
Hengen WangDepartment of Urology, Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing, 100853, China.
Shujun YangDepartment of Urology, Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing, 100853, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThrough the investigation of the current situation of bladder cancer secondary electrotomy performed by urologists in China, it provides reference for further improvement and improvement of diagnosis and treatment norms.

methodsFrom September 3, 2023 to October 7, 2023, questionnaires compiled by researchers were distributed and collected from urologists across the country in the form of electronic questionnaires through the questionnaire Star platform; The questionnaire data were exported online using SPSS 26.0 software (SPSS Inc, Chicago, IL, USA) and R language (R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria, Austria). Version 4.2.1) for data analysis. Count data were described by percentages, and comparisons between groups were made by chi-square test or Fisher's exact test. Logistic regression was used to screen out the influencing factors related to the status of secondary electrotomy for bladder cancer performed by Chinese urologists and to construct a predictive model for the column-line diagram. ROC curves, calibration curves, and DCA curves were plotted to evaluate the model and validate its efficacy.

resultsA total of 514 valid questionnaires were returned. 77.2% (397/514) of the physicians interviewed were from tertiary care hospitals. 21.2% (109/514) were from secondary care hospitals. The acceptance rate of secondary electrosurgical resection of bladder cancer among Chinese urologists was 87.74%, with 12.26% still opposed to the procedure.The majority of respondents believed that secondary electroresection could be performed if the indications recommended by the guidelines were met (75%), while a significant number felt that the initial electroresection was complete and did not require a second (37.74%), or they decided whether to perform a secondary electroresection based on their clinical experience (40.27%).

conclusionSurvey results indicate that secondary transurethral resection enhances staging accuracy, eliminates residual lesions, and decreases recurrence and progression rates. However, it serves as a means to compensate for shortcomings in the initial resection. Advances in NMIBC treatment techniques assist in reducing or avoiding the need for secondary transurethral resection in bladder cancer cases. This study is the first to develop a predictive model for Chinese urologists' acceptance of secondary transurethral resection for bladder cancer and analyzes their perspectives on the procedure, offering a reference for future research.

Indexed as

ElectrosurgeryPractice Patterns, Physicians'Urinary Bladder NeoplasmsUrologistsChinaEast Asian PeopleFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedSurveys and QuestionnairesBladder cancerCurrent status surveyPredictive modelingQuestionnaire surveyRe-TURBTSecondary transurethral resection

Identifiers

PMID41257657
PMCPMC12628868

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.