ArticleBMC pregnancy and childbirth2025
Maternal peer support preferences during the perinatal period.
Article in BMC pregnancy and childbirth, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundInsufficient social support for mothers in the perinatal period greatly increases their vulnerability to mental health challenges. Peer support programs are an effective strategy for preventing postpartum depression and addressing various mental health concerns during the perinatal period. However, these programs are not without their limitations, with research required to enhance peer relationships within them. This study aimed to explore mothers' preferences for peer support to facilitate positive and supportive relationships within perinatal peer support programs.
methodsA total of 14 Australian mothers participated in semi-structured focus groups or individual interviews. Thematic analysis was used to identify common patterns within the data.
resultsTwo higher-order categories of maternal peer support preferences were identified: personal and interpersonal qualities, and similar background factors. Themes (and subthemes) within personal and interpersonal qualities comprised of: an affable person (warm traits, trustworthy); values (cultural values, parenting values); able to provide adequate emotional support (emotionally supportive, listening); and support expectations (helping boundaries, availability). Similar background factors included: age related factors (age of mentor, age of youngest child); social support systems; socioeconomic status (household income; working arrangement); location (region, proximity); and perinatal experience (conception and pregnancy, birth).
conclusionsThe findings of this study provide valuable insight into mothers' preferences for peer support, enhancing the development of meaningful relationships within maternal peer support programs. Results may be useful in guiding the design of peer support programs for perinatal women.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.