ArticleBMC genomics2025
MPIDNN-GPPI: multi-protein language model with an improved deep neural network for generalized protein‒protein interaction prediction.
Article in BMC genomics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Predicting protein‒protein interactions (PPIs) plays a crucial role in understanding biological processes. Although biological experimental methods can identify PPIs, they are costly, time-consuming, labor-intensive, and often lack stability. In contrast, computational approaches for PPI prediction, particularly deep learning methods, can efficiently learn representations from protein sequences. However, the generalizability, robustness, and stability of computational PPI prediction models still need improvement, especially for species with limited verified PPI data. Protein embeddings generated by protein language models can extract features from protein sequences and reflect hierarchical biological structures, making them suitable for predicting PPIs. Therefore, in this study, we propose a novel protein sequence-based PPI prediction framework designed for generalized PPI assessment by integrating two protein language models (PLMs) and an enhanced deep neural network (MPIDNN-GPPI). Specifically, the sequences are embedded using two protein language models, Ankh and ESM-2. A deep neural network is then used to learn representations from the feature vectors produced by PLMs. Subsequently, a multi-head attention mechanism is introduced to capture long-range dependencies and fuse them with DNN-derived representations. Finally, a deep neural network is applied to assess the probability of interaction between two proteins. To evaluate the performance of MPIDNN-GPPI, nine PPI datasets were collected from the STRING database, covering a diverse set of species: five datasets from mammals (D. melanogaster, C. elegans, S. cerevisiae, H. sapiens, and M. musculus), and four datasets from plants (O. sativa, A. thaliana, G. max, and Z. mays). When trained on H. sapiens, MPIDNN-GPPI achieved AUC values of 0.959, 0.966, 0.954, and 0.916 on independent test sets for M. musculus, D. melanogaster, C. elegans, and S. cerevisiae, respectively. These results represent the best performance among all PPI models compared in this study. Similarly, when trained on O. sativa, the model achieved AUC values of 0.96, 0.95, and 0.913 on independent datasets for A. thaliana, G. max, and Z. mays, respectively. Ablation experiments demonstrated that models combining Ankh and ESM-2 outperformed those relying on a single protein language model. Furthermore, MPIDNN-GPPI, which incorporates multi-head attention and deep neural networks (DNN), achieved superior performance compared to models using DNN alone. These findings indicate that MPIDNN-GPPI possesses strong generalization capability for cross-species PPI prediction. The proposed model, trained on one species, can be effectively applied to accurately predict PPIs in other species.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.