Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41257586›Full record

ArticleBMC genomics2025

MPIDNN-GPPI: multi-protein language model with an improved deep neural network for generalized protein‒protein interaction prediction.

Yane Li, Chengfeng Wang, Haibo Gu, Zhentao Long, Ming Fan, Lihua Li

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC genomics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Yane LiCollege of Mathematics and Computer Science, Zhejiang A&F University, Hangzhou, 311300, China.
Chengfeng WangCollege of Mathematics and Computer Science, Zhejiang A&F University, Hangzhou, 311300, China.
Haibo GuCollege of Mathematics and Computer Science, Zhejiang A&F University, Hangzhou, 311300, China.
Zhentao LongCollege of Mathematics and Computer Science, Zhejiang A&F University, Hangzhou, 311300, China.
Ming FanSchool of Automation, Hangzhou Dianzi University, Hangzhou, 310018, China. ming.fan@hdu.edu.cn.
Lihua LiSchool of Automation, Hangzhou Dianzi University, Hangzhou, 310018, China. lilh@hdu.edu.cn.

Funding

the National Natural Science Foun-dation of China 62271178the Research Development Foundation of Zhejiang A&F University 2019RF065
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Predicting protein‒protein interactions (PPIs) plays a crucial role in understanding biological processes. Although biological experimental methods can identify PPIs, they are costly, time-consuming, labor-intensive, and often lack stability. In contrast, computational approaches for PPI prediction, particularly deep learning methods, can efficiently learn representations from protein sequences. However, the generalizability, robustness, and stability of computational PPI prediction models still need improvement, especially for species with limited verified PPI data. Protein embeddings generated by protein language models can extract features from protein sequences and reflect hierarchical biological structures, making them suitable for predicting PPIs. Therefore, in this study, we propose a novel protein sequence-based PPI prediction framework designed for generalized PPI assessment by integrating two protein language models (PLMs) and an enhanced deep neural network (MPIDNN-GPPI). Specifically, the sequences are embedded using two protein language models, Ankh and ESM-2. A deep neural network is then used to learn representations from the feature vectors produced by PLMs. Subsequently, a multi-head attention mechanism is introduced to capture long-range dependencies and fuse them with DNN-derived representations. Finally, a deep neural network is applied to assess the probability of interaction between two proteins. To evaluate the performance of MPIDNN-GPPI, nine PPI datasets were collected from the STRING database, covering a diverse set of species: five datasets from mammals (D. melanogaster, C. elegans, S. cerevisiae, H. sapiens, and M. musculus), and four datasets from plants (O. sativa, A. thaliana, G. max, and Z. mays). When trained on H. sapiens, MPIDNN-GPPI achieved AUC values of 0.959, 0.966, 0.954, and 0.916 on independent test sets for M. musculus, D. melanogaster, C. elegans, and S. cerevisiae, respectively. These results represent the best performance among all PPI models compared in this study. Similarly, when trained on O. sativa, the model achieved AUC values of 0.96, 0.95, and 0.913 on independent datasets for A. thaliana, G. max, and Z. mays, respectively. Ablation experiments demonstrated that models combining Ankh and ESM-2 outperformed those relying on a single protein language model. Furthermore, MPIDNN-GPPI, which incorporates multi-head attention and deep neural networks (DNN), achieved superior performance compared to models using DNN alone. These findings indicate that MPIDNN-GPPI possesses strong generalization capability for cross-species PPI prediction. The proposed model, trained on one species, can be effectively applied to accurately predict PPIs in other species.

Indexed as

Computational BiologyDeep LearningNeural Networks, ComputerProtein Interaction MappingAnimalsCaenorhabditis elegansHumansCross-speciesDeep neural networkPPI predictionProtein language model

Identifiers

PMID41257586
PMCPMC12628903

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.