ArticleBMC bioinformatics2025
Denoising single-cell RNA-seq data with a deep learning-embedded statistical framework.
Article in BMC bioinformatics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundSingle-cell RNA sequencing (scRNA-seq) provides extensive opportunities to explore cellular heterogeneity but is often limited by substantial technical noise and variability. The prevalence of zero counts, arising from both biological variation and technical dropout events, poses significant challenges for downstream analyses. Existing imputation methods face inherent trade-offs: statistical approaches maintain interpretability but exhibit limited capacity for capturing complex, non-linear gene expression relationships, whereas deep learning methods demonstrate superior flexibility but are prone to overfitting and lack mechanistic interpretability, particularly in settings with limited sample sizes.
methodsWe present ZILLNB (Zero-Inflated Latent factors Learning-based Negative Binomial), a novel computational framework that integrates zero-inflated negative binomial (ZINB) regression with deep generative modeling. ZILLNB employs an ensemble architecture combining Information Variational Autoencoder (InfoVAE) and Generative Adversarial Network (GAN) to learn latent representations at cellular and gene levels. These latent factors serve as dynamic covariates within a ZINB regression framework, with parameters iteratively optimized through an Expectation-Maximization algorithm. This approach enables systematic decomposition of technical variability from intrinsic biological heterogeneity.
resultsComparative evaluations across multiple scRNA-seq datasets demonstrate ZILLNB's superior performance. In cell type classification tasks using mouse cortex and human PBMC datasets, ZILLNB achieved the highest Adjusted Rand index (ARI) and Adjusted Mutual Information (AMI) among tested methods, with improvements ranging from 0.05 to 0.2 over VIPER, scImpute, DCA, DeepImpute, SAVER, scMultiGAN and ALRA. For differential expression analysis validated against matched bulk RNA-seq data, ZILLNB demonstrated improvements ranging from 0.05 to 0.3 for area under the Receiver Operating Characteristic curve (AUC-ROC) and the Precision-Recall curve (AUC-PR) compared to standard and other imputation methods, with consistently lower false discovery rates. Application to idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) datasets revealed distinct fibroblast subpopulations undergoing fibroblast-to-myofibroblast transition, validated through marker gene expression and pathway enrichment analyses.
conclusionZILLNB provides a principled framework for addressing technical artifacts in scRNA-seq data while preserving biological variation. The integration of statistical modeling with deep learning enables robust performance across diverse analytical tasks, including cell type identification, differential expression analysis, and rare cell population discovery, demonstrating utility across common single-cell analysis tasks.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.