ArticleBMC primary care2025
Understanding the potential role of Social Prescribing Link Workers in supporting identified needs of people with physical and mental long-term conditions: a qualitative study.
Article in BMC primary care, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Bayesian re-analysis suggests participation rather than referral underlies the benefits of social prescribing for chronic diseases.Frontiers in public health · 2026Pooled it
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe Social Prescribing Link Worker (SPLW) approach is a means for supporting individuals and communities with diverse needs, with its reach and impact widely recognised in health and community systems. However, SPLW support for people with long-term physical and mental health conditions (P + MH LTCs) has been variable and there are knowledge gaps such as unheard voices of those with a varied engagement in SPLW support. We undertook a study to better understand the potential relevance of SPLW support for addressing the needs of individuals with P + MH LTCs. Its aim was to explore a range of health and psychosocial needs of people living with P + MH LTCs and to examine perspectives on how the SPLW role supports the complex needs of this group.
methodsA qualitative study utilising one-to-one semi-structured interviews with community dwelling adults (aged ≥ 18 years old) living with P + MH LTCs with diverse socio-demographic and clinical characteristics. Research was informed by a Patient and Public Involvement and Engagement (PPIE) group for meaningful and inclusive research activities, and qualitative data were analysed using a Framework Method.
resultsAnalysis revealed five themes and sixteen sub-themes that collectively demonstrate the complex and shifting experience of living with P + MH LTCs. This population dealt with competing multi-layered needs, and felt that the potential role of SPLW support to mitigate some of the unmet demands of this group was not effectively carried out in practice. This meant that potential benefits were often missed.
conclusionsOur findings demonstrate that this population is experiencing a substantial impact on health and wellbeing, and that there is an urgent need for integrated health and care systems that are complemented by consistent, coordinated and skilled SPLW support. Lessons learnt in this research provide new evidence and suggest directions for further research.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.