ArticleBMC genomics2025
Contamination of fungal genomes of Onygenaceae (Phylum Ascomycota) in public databases: incidence, detection, and impact.
Article in BMC genomics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Genomic datasets often contain unwanted, foreign, or erroneous nucleotide sequences that do not belong to the organism under study. Such contamination can significantly compromise genome analyses, reducing the accuracy and reliability of the results. Despite its potential impact, few studies have addressed the contamination of fungal genomes by exogenous sequences. Here, we analyzed eleven publicly available genomes of fungi from the family Onygenaceae, retrieved from the National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI) database. A comprehensive quality assessment was performed, evaluating genome completeness, contiguity, and contamination levels. Genomes with lower statistical quality and putatively contaminated were selected for further improvement. To enhance assembly quality, we built a custom Kraken 2 database including four high-quality genomes of closely related fungal taxa. After filtering, we reassessed the genomes to compare contiguity, completeness, and contamination levels before and after the process. Furthermore, structural and functional annotation was conducted to evaluate changes in predicted proteins, protein families and domains. Additionally, Average nucleotide identity and phylogenetic analyses were performed to further assess the impact of the filtering. Four genomes showed low-quality statistics and contamination levels between 5 and 12%, mainly of bacteria origin. After removing the contaminated regions, assembly quality metrics improved, and contamination level dropped below 3% in all cases. Functional annotation of the filtered assemblies revealed a reduction in bacteria-associated protein families. Our results demonstrate the presence of contamination in publicly available Onygenaceae fungal genomes and highlight its potential to bias downstream analyses. We emphasize the importance of contamination screening and removal to ensure reliable genomic data for fungal research.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.