ArticleChemical senses2025
Effect of taste recall training using 5 sweet substances on sweet taste sensitivities.
Article in Chemical senses, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The mechanisms involved in the discrimination of basic tastes have been previously studied. However, the mechanisms that differentiate between various substances within the same taste quality remain largely unexplored. This study aimed to determine whether individuals can distinguish 5 different sweet substances and whether this ability can be improved through taste recall training, serving as an entry point for elucidating the underlying mechanism. Forty healthy individuals were divided into 2 groups: a training group (10 males and 10 females) and a control group (10 males and 10 females). The taste recall training involved 5 sweet substances: glucose, fructose, sucrose, maltose, and lactose. Using the filter paper disc method, participants recalled the taste of the 5 sweet substances at a concentration one level below their taste thresholds and then matched the 5 substances. This training was conducted for 3 consecutive days. There were no significant differences in the number of participants, sex, age, body mass index, oral moisture, or baseline taste sensitivity between the training and control groups. The training group showed a significant improvement in the taste thresholds for all 5 sweet substances compared to the control group (glucose: P < 0.001, fructose: P < 0.001, sucrose: P < 0.001, maltose: P < 0.005, lactose: P < 0.001). These findings suggest that taste recall training enhances taste sensitivity for all 5 sweet substances and may improve both taste thresholds and discrimination performance within the same taste quality.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.