ArticleTurkish archives of pediatrics2025
Fetal Congenital Anomalies: Multi-Regional Magnetic Resonance Imaging Evaluation with Prenatal Ultrasound Correlation.
Article in Turkish archives of pediatrics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: The objective is to characterize the complete spectrum of fetal congenital anomalies across all organ systems using fetal magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and to assess the comparative advantages of MRI and obstetric ultrasound. Materials and Methods: This retrospective descriptive study included all referral fetal MRI scans performed between January 2020 and February 2024. Demographic and clinical data were extracted from institutional records. All US examinations were performed by experienced perinatologists. All MRIs were interpreted by a pediatric radiologist using a standardized protocol on a 1.5T scanner. Anomalies were categorized as craniospinal, body, head/neck, or other, with further subclassification of central nervous system and body anomalies. Results: A total of 271 fetuses from 249 women (including 22 twin pregnancies) were evaluated. The mean maternal age was 29.2 ± 5.8 years, and the mean gestational age at the time of MRI was 29.5 ± 3.3 weeks. Craniospinal malformations were present in 187 fetuses (69%), body anomalies in 30 (11.1%), head/neck abnormalities in 7 (2.6%), and other anomalies in 6 (2.2%). Twenty fetuses (7.4%) had intrauterine demise, and 38 (14%) were normal. Magnetic resonance imaging provided additional diagnostic information in 52 cases (19.2%), primarily refining cortical malformations or ruling out suspected anomalies, whereas US identified findings not visualized on MRI in 18 cases (6.6%), mainly vertebral segmentation and extremity anomalies. Conclusion: Fetal MRI complements obstetric US by contributing additional diagnostic detail in approximately one-fifth of cases, particularly for cortical and CNS anomalies, and confirms or refines US findings. Integration of both modalities improves congenital anomaly detection and supports informed patient management.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.