Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41257415›Full record

ArticleTurkish archives of pediatrics2025

Comparison of Ventilator-Derived and Modified Bubble Continuous Positive Airway Pressure for Early Stabilization of Transient Tachypnea of the Newborn: A Retrospective Cohort Study in a Transitional Care Unit.

Ercan Tutak, Zeynep Tutar Çelik

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Turkish archives of pediatrics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Ercan TutakDivision of Neonatology, Department of Pediatrics, Prof. Dr. Cemil Taşcıoğlu City Hospital, İstanbul, Türkiye.ORCID 0000-0002-5076-8400
Zeynep Tutar ÇelikDepartment of Pediatrics, Prof. Dr. Cemil Taşcıoğlu City Hospital, İstanbul, Türkiye.ORCID 0009-0001-3969-7023

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: To compare the clinical effectiveness of ventilator-derived continuous positive airway pressure (vCPAP) and modified bubble CPAP (mbCPAP) in the early management of respiratory distress among late preterm and term neonates in a neonatal transitional care unit (NTCU) setting. Materials and Methods: This retrospective cohort study included infants born at ≥34 weeks' gestation who developed respiratory distress shortly after birth and received CPAP in the delivery room between April 1, 2023, and January 25, 2024. Based on resource availability, infants received either vCPAP or mbCPAP. The primary outcome was neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) admission. Secondary outcomes included intubation, length of hospital stay, and complications such as pneumothorax, nasal septum injury, and mortality. Results: A total of 141 infants were included (68 mbCPAP, 73 vCPAP). Baseline characteristics were similar between groups. The NICU admission was required in 39.7% of the mbCPAP group and 30.1% of the vCPAP group (P = .23). Intubation rates, duration of hospitalization, and complication rates were comparable between groups. No cases of pneumothorax, nasal septum injury, or mortality occurred in either group. Conclusion: In neonates ≥34 weeks with early respiratory distress, vCPAP and mbCPAP were similarly effective in preventing NICU admission. The mbCPAP may serve as a feasible and safe alternative in resource-constrained delivery room settings.

Indexed as

Continuous positive airway pressureneonatal respiratory distress syndrometransient tachypnea of the newborntransitional care units

Identifiers

PMID41257415
PMCPMC12613520

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.