Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41257392›Full record

ReviewTurkish archives of pediatrics2025

Evaluating the Use of Nasal Epinephrine in Anaphylaxis: Current Status.

Hayrunnisa Bekis Bozkurt, İlknur Pençe

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Turkish archives of pediatrics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Hayrunnisa Bekis BozkurtDivision of Pediatric Allergy and Immunology, Department of Pediatrics, Ümraniye Research and Training Hospital, İstanbul, Türkiye.ORCID 0000-0001-8642-4872
İlknur PençeDepartment of Pediatrics, Ministry of Health Kilis Prof. Dr. Alaeddin Yavaşça State Hospital, Kilis, Türkiye.ORCID 0009-0007-6121-9021

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The use of epinephrine auto-injectors is life-saving in serious allergic reactions such as out-ofhospital anaphylaxis. However, several factors limit their use, including patients not obtaining their prescriptions, the difficulty of carrying auto-injectors, and fear of injection. Administering epinephrine as early as possible to a patient experiencing anaphylaxis significantly reduces mortality and morbidity. Many experts are therefore interested in developing life-saving medical treatments in forms that are easier to access and apply. Nasal epinephrine consists of 3 components: epinephrine, a unit-dose spray, and İntravair. This spray was developed in collaboration with both the Food and Drug Administration and the European Medicines Agency. In addition to its ease of use, nasal epinephrine has shown favorable pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic (PD) responses for various symptoms, including allergic and infectious rhinitis. Notably, it has been found that nasal epinephrine provides a better PD response than injections; the increase in heart rate and blood pressure within 1 minute of administration confirms receptor activation in this drug's mechanism of action. These findings indicate that nasal epinephrine could be a choice for the treatment of serious allergic reactions, including anaphylaxis, and could be safe and effective.

Indexed as

anaphylaxisepinephrine auto-injectorNasal epinephrinesevere allergic reactions

Identifiers

PMID41257392
PMCPMC12613457

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.