ArticleInternational journal of cancer2026
Treatment and survival of patients with esophageal and gastric cancer in the Netherlands and Belgium: A population-based comparison.
Article in International journal of cancer, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Treatment and survival of patients with esophageal and gastric cancer in the Netherlands and Belgium: A population-based comparison.International journal of cancer · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Despite demographic and socio-economic similarities between the Netherlands and Belgium, differences in survival for patients with esophageal and gastric cancer between the two countries exist. This population-based study investigated these survival differences with the aim of identifying explaining factors. We analyzed data from the Netherlands Cancer Registry (N = 26,980) and the Belgian Cancer Registry (N = 15,097) for patients diagnosed with esophageal or gastric cancer between 2010 and 2016. Survival differences were examined using relative survival, stratified for tumor location and stage. Factors that potentially mediated the survival differences were tested via multivariable excess hazard models controlling for baseline population mortalities. Five-year relative survival probability was significantly lower for patients from the Netherlands with esophageal cancer (EC) or gastric cancer (GC) (EC: 21% (20%-22%), GC: 20% (19%-21%)) compared to Belgian patients (EC: 24% (23%-25%), GC: 27% (25%-29%)). Across tumor stages, relative survival of patients with esophageal and gastric cancer was lower among patients from the Netherlands. Multivariable excess hazard modeling showed that survival differences of patients with stage IV disease disappeared when adjusting for treatment. This was not observed among patients with stage I-III gastric cancer, where survival differences remained after adjustment for treatment. Survival of patients with esophageal cancer and gastric cancer is generally higher in Belgium. For patients with stage IV disease, this difference can most likely be attributed to differences in treatment. Although treatment explains part of the survival differences for patients with curable disease, other causes remain largely unknown.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.