ArticleWorld journal of gastroenterology2025
Comparison of clinical outcomes for single- and double-balloon enteroscope-assisted endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography in patients with surgically altered anatomy.
Article in World journal of gastroenterology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Current Evidence on Endoscopic Biliary Drainage in the Era of Surgically Altered Anatomy: A Narrative Review.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2026Review
- The role of enteroscopy in the diagnosis and interventional management of small intestine diseases.Therapeutic advances in gastroenterology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundBalloon-assisted enteroscopy with a specialized overtube has improved the success of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) in patients with surgically altered anatomy (SAA). However, direct comparative data between double-balloon enteroscopy (DBE) and single-balloon enteroscopy (SBE) remain limited.
aimTo compare the ERCP-related outcomes between DBE and SBE in patients with SAA.
methodsWe retrospectively reviewed the medical records of 1042 patients with SAA who underwent ERCP. After propensity score matching for age and sex, 494 patients were included, with 247 patients in each of the SBE and DBE groups.
resultsThe success rates of intubation, cannulation, completion of intended ERCP, and adverse events were similar between the DBE and SBE groups (94.3%
conclusionDBE and SBE showed comparable clinical success and safety profiles in ERCP for patients with SAA, although SBE required significantly longer procedure times. DBE could provide procedural efficiency benefits in cases where an extended procedure duration is expected. Furthermore, a preserved gastric anatomy and Roux-en-Y reconstruction were identified as independent risk factors for intubation failure.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.