Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41257266›Full record

ArticleOpen mind : discoveries in cognitive science2025

Learning to Decompose: Human-Like Subgoal Preferences Emerge in Neural Networks Learning Graph Traversal.

Yuxuan Li, James L McClelland

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Open mind : discoveries in cognitive science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Yuxuan LiDepartment of Psychology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA.
James L McClellandDepartment of Psychology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cognitive scientists have discovered normative and heuristic principles that capture human subgoal preferences when partitioning problems into smaller ones. However, it remains unclear where such preferences come from and why they tend to be both effective and efficient. In this work, we study the processes through which these preferences may be implicitly encoded over learning as learners improve towards optimal traversals. We build on the graph-based environments from prior work and use neural networks as model learners to test if learning shortest-path traversal can lead to human-like path decomposition. We find that simple transformer models develop a preference for paths containing nodes that occur frequently on the shortest paths, consistent with human subgoal preferences found in prior work. This preference is observed when models solve shortest path traversals for unseen problems in both known graphs and new graphs, demonstrating that human-like subgoal preferences can arise without requiring explicit preference computation or exhaustively searching over all possible paths. The same preference does not emerge when models learn to perform random or Hamiltonian traversals. Our findings are robust across several transformer variants as well as recurrent neural networks, suggesting they depend more on the data distribution than the network architecture.

Indexed as

cognitionlearningneural networksubgoaltask decomposition

Identifiers

PMID41257266
PMCPMC12622450

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.