ArticlePatient preference and adherence2025
Exploring Patient Preference Information in Clinical Research and Decision Models: An Investigative Survey.
Article in Patient preference and adherence, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: Patient preferences are playing an increasingly pivotal role in defining care pathways, assessing care quality, and advancing healthcare technologies, but their current use remains unclear. Patients and Methods: We conducted an online survey collecting data from 46 experts in clinical research, pharmaceutical industry, regulatory affairs, and health technology assessment. Results: About 30% of our respondents are using patient preference information routinely, and 90% are willing to prioritize its integration in the future. This is despite challenges such as limited patient engagement, difficulty in obtaining reliable data, and reluctance to deviate from traditional practices. Conclusion: Here, we show a growing recognition of the potential benefits of integrating patient preference information, and that concerted efforts and investments are necessary to support wider adoption.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.