Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41257207›Full record

ArticleResearch and practice in thrombosis and haemostasis2025

Comparative

Wan Hui Ong Clausen, Ties Latendorf, Rielana Stehr, Mirella Ezban, Jacob Lund

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Research and practice in thrombosis and haemostasis, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Wan Hui Ong ClausenBiostatistics, Novo Nordisk A/S, Søborg, Denmark.
Ties LatendorfLaboratorium für Klinische Forschung (LKF) GmbH, Kiel, Germany.
Rielana StehrLaboratorium für Klinische Forschung (LKF) GmbH, Kiel, Germany.
Mirella EzbanGlobal Drug Discovery, Novo Nordisk A/S, Måløv, Denmark.
Jacob LundGlobal Drug Discovery, Novo Nordisk A/S, Måløv, Denmark.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Mim8 is a next-generation activated factor (F)VIII-mimetic, bispecific antibody, currently in clinical development for the prophylactic treatment of hemophilia A. To evaluate the Objectives: To compare the pharmacodynamic results from FRONTIER1 and FRONTIER2 by evaluating Mim8 Methods: TG was assessed Results: Within the tested Mim8 concentration range, a constant TG response ratio was observed between the 2 triggers. TF-triggered peak thrombin levels were approximately 3 to 4 times lower than those triggered by FXIa. Both triggers exhibited similar endogenous thrombin potential responses, although FXIa showed slightly higher values. These differences were consistent in both Conclusion: While both assays are considered relevant for assessing Mim8 pharmacodynamic response, systematic and consistent differences between TGAs triggered by FXIa and TF were observed, indicating different kinetics in the intrinsic and extrinsic pathways.

Indexed as

activated factor XIfactor VIIIhemophilia AMim8thrombin generation assaytissue factor

Identifiers

PMID41257207
PMCPMC12621559

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.