ArticleERJ open research2025
Heart rate, respiratory rate and airflow variability differences between stable and exacerbating COPD patients.
Article in ERJ open research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Rationale: Earlier identification and treatment of COPD exacerbations leads to improved clinical outcomes. Wearable technology has the ability to measure physiological signal variability, which is likely to be different in states of stability and exacerbation. The objectives of the present study were to analyse signals, including heart rate, respiratory rate and airflow, from a novel small wearable device, AcuPebble RE100 and compare differences in a group of stable and exacerbating participants. Methods: Groups of stable and exacerbating adult participants with COPD were asked to wear AcuPebble RE100, which records physiological signals including heart rate, respiratory rate and airflow. Linear and nonlinear variability analysis was conducted on each of these time-series to detect differences between groups. Results: A total of 51 participants (33 stable and 18 exacerbating) were analysed. Stable participants used the device for a median (interquartile range) of 18 nights (10-26). The exacerbating participants had significantly higher heart rate variability measures and a significantly lower heart rate complexity measure compared with stable participants. Respiratory rate variability and complexity were significantly increased in the exacerbating participants. Detrended fluctuation analysis demonstrated two crossover points in both populations, with the exacerbating participants demonstrating a significantly lower median α3 (0.50 (0.47-0.56) Conclusion: We have shown that significant differences exist in heart rate, respiratory rate and airflow variability measures between stable and exacerbating groups of COPD. This will help build exacerbation detection algorithms in the future.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.