Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41257132›Full record

ReviewCureus2025

Machine Learning Applications Beyond Outcome Prediction in Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery: A Systematic Review of Diagnostic, Intraoperative, and Workflow Optimization Models.

Abdulkreem Al-Juhani, Faisal Alzahrani, Omer Altamımı, Rodan Desoky, Lajeen Alnowaisser, Ibrahim Altamımı, Abdullah Esmail

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Abdulkreem Al-JuhaniForensic Medicine, Forensic Medicine Center, Jeddah, SAU.
Faisal AlzahraniOtolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, King Saud University, Riyadh, SAU.
Omer AltamımıSurgery, King Abdulaziz University Hospital, Jeddah, SAU.
Rodan DesokyMedicine and Surgery, Alfaisal University College of Medicine, Riyadh, SAU.
Lajeen AlnowaisserMedicine, Al Maarefa University, Riyadh, SAU.
Ibrahim AltamımıSurgery, Aldireyah Hospital, Riyadh, SAU.
Abdullah EsmailSurgery, Dubai Academic Health Corporation, Dubai, ARE.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Plastic and reconstructive surgery increasingly depends on data-driven instruments to improve clinical decision-making. Machine learning (ML), through its capacity to analyze intricate, high-dimensional data, presents novel prospects for forecasting surgical outcomes with enhanced accuracy compared to traditional statistical models. This systematic study evaluates the extent, efficacy, and methodological rigor of ML applications in plastic and reconstructive surgery, encompassing burn treatment, microsurgical reconstruction, and breast surgery. Following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) 2020 standards, we searched four main databases for research published between January 2015 and March 2025. Eligible papers used ML models to predict clinical outcomes in plastic or reconstructive surgery and provided quantifiable performance indicators. Data were retrieved using the Checklist for Critical Appraisal and Data Extraction for Systematic Reviews of Prediction Modelling Studies (CHARMS) and Prediction Model Risk of Bias Assessment Tool (PROBAST) frameworks, then synthesized narratively. We included eleven studies that had more than 34,000 patients. Random forests, neural networks, and gradient boosting have emerged as the most prevalent and highest-performing models, with several attaining AUCs exceeding 0.90. Notwithstanding encouraging outcomes, the majority of research depended on internal validation, with only one performing external validation. Calibration reporting and data transparency were constrained. The majority of studies exhibited a high or moderate risk of bias. In summary, ML models provide significant prediction accuracy in plastic surgery; yet, they are limited by methodological deficiencies that impede clinical implementation. Future initiatives must prioritize external validation, repeatability, and ethical execution to facilitate the safe and successful incorporation into surgical practice.

Indexed as

ai and machine learninggeneral plastic surgeryplastic and reconstructive surgeryplastic surgerysurgery

Identifiers

PMID41257132
PMCPMC12620100

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.