ArticleCureus2025
Suspected Achilles Tendon Ruptures and the Course of Action: Assessing Compliance With Local Protocols.
Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionAchilles tendon rupture is a significant injury that can cause prolonged disability and impact quality of life. It typically occurs during sports or activities involving sudden loading of the tendon, most often in active adults. Early recognition and appropriate management are vital to reduce complications, optimise healing, and support timely return to function. Clinical pathways provide structured guidance for consistent care, including immobilisation, prophylaxis, imaging, and specialist follow-up. Variation in adherence to such pathways may compromise outcomes. Clinical audit provides a means to evaluate current practice against pathway standards, while closed-loop audits allow assessment of targeted interventions aimed at improving compliance.
methodsA closed-loop audit was performed at a large district general hospital to assess compliance with a locally developed Achilles tendon rupture pathway. The first cycle reviewed 138 patients between October 2022 and September 2023. Following the dissemination of results, display of posters in relevant areas, and introduction of a dedicated "Ultrasound Achilles" request form, a second cycle reviewed 44 patients between March and June 2024. Standards included venous thromboembolism (VTE) prophylaxis, weight-bearing advice, immobilisation, ultrasound imaging within 14 days, and referral to a virtual fracture clinic (VFC). Data were analysed using chi-squared tests.
resultsIn cycle 1 (
conclusionTargeted interventions improved compliance with several aspects of the pathway, though VTE prophylaxis prescribing showed little progress. Ongoing education, structured pathways, and regular re-audits are essential to sustain improvement and ensure optimal outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.