Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41257103›Full record

ReviewCureus2025

Testosterone Replacement in Prostate Carcinoma: A Systematic Review of an Emerging Paradigm and Therapeutic Potential.

Jared Robinson, Indrajit Banerjee, Indraneel Banerjee

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Genetic Polymorphisms and Antioxidant Reactions in Prostate Cancer.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Jared RobinsonSurgery, Joe Morolong Memorial Hospital, Vryburg, ZAF.
Indrajit BanerjeePharmacology, Sir Seewoosagur Ramgoolam Medical College, Belle Rive, MUS.
Indraneel BanerjeeUrology, University of Florida Health, Jacksonville, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Prostate carcinoma is one of the most prevalent cancers among men. It is a dreaded outcome in the elderly male population and most commonly affects those 65 years of age and older. The etiologic nature of this common urological cancer is multifactorial and has an environmental, racial, and genetic interplay. One of the important factors believed to be involved in the causation of prostate carcinoma are androgens and prostatic sensitivity. Conventional treatment for this neoplasm ranges from radical surgery (prostatectomy), external beam radiation, brachytherapy, and androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) to radiopharmaceutical techniques. The conventional consensus is that external testosterone replacement therapy (TRT) is contraindicated in patients with prostate carcinoma or who are at risk thereof. The latest data and studies are challenging this notion and relationship. It is paramount that these misconceptions and older conventions are definitively and clearly corrected so as to ensure the best and most suitable treatment is made available to patients. This systematic review aims to find the relation between testosterone replacement therapy and prostate carcinoma. An extensive review of literature was done on the following databases: Google Scholar, Trip Database, EMBASE, PubMed, and PubMed Central to collate the latest data available on testosterone replacement therapy and prostate carcinoma for a systematic review. A combination of keywords was used for data extraction: "Hormone Replacement Therapy" OR "Prostate" OR "Prostatic Neoplasms" OR "Testosterone" OR "Urology." A triad of findings were noted: (1) exogenous testosterone replacement therapy is not contraindicated in men who have undergone definite treatment for their prostatic carcinoma (prostatectomy, external beam radiation, and/or chemotherapy), (2) exogenous testosterone replacement therapy does not alter intraprostatic dehydroepiandrosterone (DHEA) levels and thus does not attenuate or catalyze any change in the prostatic milieu, and (3) castration-resistant prostatic carcinoma does not undergo disease progression when treated using high-dose testosterone replacement therapy. No correlation between testosterone replacement therapy and prostate carcinoma exists, and TRT is not contraindicated in men post-definitive treatment for their primary neoplastic prostatic lesion. TRT is indicated in hypogonadal men post-primary treatment for its myriad of benefits and ultimate improvement of quality of life. The role of TRT in men prior to the diagnosis of prostatic carcinoma is unclear; thus, patients should give their informed consent before receiving the testosterone therapy. The role of TRT in prostate cancer is evolving, even in cases of advanced prostate cancer. One area of interest is bipolar androgen therapy (BAT), which has been studied in various clinical trials focused on castrate-resistant prostate cancer. Prostate cancer cells adapt to chronic low testosterone levels by increasing androgen receptor activity, resulting in a 30- to 90-fold rise in androgen receptor levels. Although this significant upregulation of androgen receptors can lead to castration resistance, it also creates a therapeutic vulnerability to treatment with high doses of testosterone, which can result in growth arrest or cell death. The term "bipolar" in BAT refers to the rapid switching between two extremes: from high testosterone levels (supraphysiologic) to near-castrate serum testosterone levels.

Indexed as

exogenous testosterone usehormone replacement therapyonco-urologyprostateprostatic neoplasmstestosterone (tt)

Identifiers

PMID41257103
PMCPMC12622362

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.