ArticleJournal of clinical practice and research2025
Evaluation of Clinical Characteristics and Treatment Appropriateness in Patients Receiving Intravenous Iron Therapy.
Article in Journal of clinical practice and research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: Intravenous (IV) iron is frequently used to treat iron deficiency. While IV therapy offers several benefits, it also has drawbacks, including high costs, potential allergic reactions, and the need for hospitalization. This study aimed to assess patient- and disease-related factors in IV iron therapy and to re-evaluate treatment appropriateness using an algorithm developed from current guideline recommendations. Materials and Methods: This retrospective, single-center study included patients receiving IV iron at a tertiary care hospital between May 2 and October 15, 2023. Threshold values for iron deficiency, based on a review of current guidelines, were defined as ferritin <30 μg/L or, when C-reactive protein (CRP) ≥5 mg/L, ferritin <100 μg/L and transferrin saturation (TSAT) <20%. Results: A total of 264 patients were re-evaluated. IV iron therapy was deemed inappropriate in 81 patients (31%). The primary reason for inappropriateness in 74 patients (28%) was the lack of preference for oral iron therapy as the first-line option. Inappropriate treatment was significantly more frequent in the group without anemia (p<0.001) and among patients over 65 years old (p=0.03). Conclusion: Developing treatment algorithms that integrate evidence, patient factors, and clinical experience may help reduce unnecessary costs and improve prescription quality.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.