Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41257059›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical practice and research2025

Evaluation of Clinical Characteristics and Treatment Appropriateness in Patients Receiving Intravenous Iron Therapy.

Mert Tokatli, Neslihan Nisa Gecici, Eray Peker, Ezgi Aysu Sahin Mavi, Berat Baran, Oguz Abdullah Uyaroglu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical practice and research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Mert TokatliDepartment of Internal Medicine, Hacettepe University Faculty of Medicine, Ankara, Türkiye.
Neslihan Nisa GeciciHacettepe University Faculty of Medicine, Ankara, Türkiye.
Eray PekerHacettepe University Faculty of Medicine, Ankara, Türkiye.
Ezgi Aysu Sahin MaviDepartment of Internal Medicine, Hacettepe University Faculty of Medicine, Ankara, Türkiye.
Berat BaranDepartment of Internal Medicine, Hacettepe University Faculty of Medicine, Ankara, Türkiye.
Oguz Abdullah UyarogluDepartment of General Internal Medicine, Hacettepe University Faculty of Medicine, Ankara, Türkiye.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: Intravenous (IV) iron is frequently used to treat iron deficiency. While IV therapy offers several benefits, it also has drawbacks, including high costs, potential allergic reactions, and the need for hospitalization. This study aimed to assess patient- and disease-related factors in IV iron therapy and to re-evaluate treatment appropriateness using an algorithm developed from current guideline recommendations. Materials and Methods: This retrospective, single-center study included patients receiving IV iron at a tertiary care hospital between May 2 and October 15, 2023. Threshold values for iron deficiency, based on a review of current guidelines, were defined as ferritin <30 μg/L or, when C-reactive protein (CRP) ≥5 mg/L, ferritin <100 μg/L and transferrin saturation (TSAT) <20%. Results: A total of 264 patients were re-evaluated. IV iron therapy was deemed inappropriate in 81 patients (31%). The primary reason for inappropriateness in 74 patients (28%) was the lack of preference for oral iron therapy as the first-line option. Inappropriate treatment was significantly more frequent in the group without anemia (p<0.001) and among patients over 65 years old (p=0.03). Conclusion: Developing treatment algorithms that integrate evidence, patient factors, and clinical experience may help reduce unnecessary costs and improve prescription quality.

Indexed as

Anemiaintravenous ironiron deficiency

Identifiers

PMID41257059
PMCPMC12478576

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.