ReviewFrontiers in digital health2025
Generative AI in clinical (2020-2025): a mini-review of applications, emerging trends, and clinical challenges.
Review in Frontiers in digital health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Review
- The temporal changes in GPT-4 performance on UKMLA practice questions: educational and clinical implications.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
- Assistive, not autonomous: Generative artificial intelligence in head and neck cancer care - A scoping review.Digital healthReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Generative artificial intelligence (G-AI) has moved from proof-of-concept demonstrations to practical tools that augment radiology, dermatology, genetics, drug discovery, and electronic-health-record analysis. This mini-review synthesizes fifteen studies published between 2020 and 2025 that collectively illustrate three dominant trends: data augmentation for imbalanced or privacy-restricted datasets, automation of expert-intensive tasks such as radiology reporting, and generation of new biomedical knowledge ranging from molecular scaffolds to fairness insights. Image-centric work still dominates, with GANs, diffusion models, and Vision-Language Models expanding limited datasets and accelerating diagnosis. Yet narrative (EHR) and molecular design domains are rapidly catching up. Despite demonstrated accuracy gains, recurring challenges persist: synthetic samples may overlook rare pathologies, large multimodal systems can hallucinate clinical facts, and demographic biases can be amplified. Robust validation, interpretability techniques, and governance frameworks therefore, remain essential before G-AI can be safely embedded in routine care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.