Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41257033›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in digital health2025

Generative AI in clinical (2020-2025): a mini-review of applications, emerging trends, and clinical challenges.

Nafiz Fahad, Riadul Islam Rabbi, Sumayea Benta Hasan, Fariya Sultana Prity, Rasel Ahmed, Farhana Ahmed, Md Jakir Hossen, Tze Hui Liew, Md Shohel Sayeed, Kah Ong Michael Goh

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in digital health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Nafiz FahadFaculty of Information Science and Technology (FIST), Multimedia University, Melaka, Malaysia.
Riadul Islam RabbiFaculty of Engineering and Technology, Multimedia University, Melaka, Malaysia.
Sumayea Benta HasanFaculty of Engineering and Technology, Multimedia University, Melaka, Malaysia.
Fariya Sultana PrityDepartment of Computer Science, American International University-Bangladesh, Dhaka, Bangladesh.
Rasel AhmedFaculty of Science and Technology, American International University-Bangladesh, Dhaka, Bangladesh.
Farhana AhmedFaculty of Engineering and Technology, Multimedia University, Melaka, Malaysia.
Md Jakir HossenCenter for Advanced Analytics (CAA), COE for Artificial Intelligence, Faculty of Engineering & Technology (FET), Multimedia University, Melaka, Malaysia.
Tze Hui LiewCentre for Intelligent Cloud Computing (CICC), COE of Advanced Cloud, Faculty of Information Science & Technology, Multimedia University, Melaka, Malaysia.
Md Shohel SayeedCentre for Intelligent Cloud Computing (CICC), COE of Advanced Cloud, Faculty of Information Science & Technology, Multimedia University, Melaka, Malaysia.
Kah Ong Michael GohCenter for Image and Vision Computing, COE for Artificial Intelligence, Faculty of Information Science and Technology, Multimedia University, Melaka, Malaysia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Generative artificial intelligence (G-AI) has moved from proof-of-concept demonstrations to practical tools that augment radiology, dermatology, genetics, drug discovery, and electronic-health-record analysis. This mini-review synthesizes fifteen studies published between 2020 and 2025 that collectively illustrate three dominant trends: data augmentation for imbalanced or privacy-restricted datasets, automation of expert-intensive tasks such as radiology reporting, and generation of new biomedical knowledge ranging from molecular scaffolds to fairness insights. Image-centric work still dominates, with GANs, diffusion models, and Vision-Language Models expanding limited datasets and accelerating diagnosis. Yet narrative (EHR) and molecular design domains are rapidly catching up. Despite demonstrated accuracy gains, recurring challenges persist: synthetic samples may overlook rare pathologies, large multimodal systems can hallucinate clinical facts, and demographic biases can be amplified. Robust validation, interpretability techniques, and governance frameworks therefore, remain essential before G-AI can be safely embedded in routine care.

Indexed as

diffusion modelselectronic-health-recordGANsgenerative AIVision-Language Models

Identifiers

PMID41257033
PMCPMC12620437

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.