ArticleReproductive medicine and biology
Influence of Medical Versus Surgical Evacuation of Early Miscarriage Loss on Reproductive Outcomes of Women in Subsequent FET Cycle.
Article in Reproductive medicine and biology. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Influence of Medical Versus Surgical Evacuation of Early Miscarriage Loss on Reproductive Outcomes of Women in Subsequent FET Cycle.Reproductive medicine and biologyArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: To investigate how two methods for managing early miscarriage after frozen embryo transfer (FET) cycles impact live birth rates and other reproductive and perinatal outcomes in subsequent FET cycles without preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy (PGT-A). Methods: This retrospective cohort study of women undergoing FET cycles (January 2016-December 2022) in our department who experienced early miscarriage diagnosed by transvaginal ultrasound examined the impact of medical versus surgical evacuation on subsequent live birth rates (LBR). Results: Analysis of 1685 women revealed no significant differences in implantation, miscarriage, preterm birth, obstetric complications, or neonatal disease rates between groups. However, the surgical management group had lower positive pregnancy test, clinical pregnancy, and live birth rates, and higher cesarean rates. While adjustments for confounders eliminated the significance of differences in positive pregnancy tests and clinical pregnancies, lower live birth rates (aOR 0.80, 95% CI: 0.65-0.99) and higher cesarean rates (aOR 1.84, 95% CI: 1.19-2.84) persisted. The surgical group also showed significantly reduced endometrial thickness in subsequent cycles. Conclusion: Subsequent FET cycles after surgical miscarriage evacuation show lower live birth rates and thinner endometrial lining than those following medical evacuation; surgical evacuation also correlates with increased cesarean section rates in non-PGT-A FET cycles.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.